Status shift: Difference between revisions
Typo fixing, typos fixed: undesireable → undesirable using AWB |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{unreferenced|date=November 2009}} |
{{unreferenced|date=November 2009}} |
||
{{Confusing|date=December 2006}} |
{{Confusing|date=December 2006}} |
||
A '''status shift''' |
A '''status shift''' is the transition from one social status to another one. Some [[social status|status]]es are mutually exclusive, like military or civilian, laicos or religious, noble or commoner. Other statuses are not mutually exclusive, but contextual. One of the identities might be used in certain settings, while the other is used in different settings where the other status is unfavorable, undesirable, or unnecessary. |
||
[[Stephen Colbert]] used the phrase in a taped interview with Harvard students in [[December 2006]], briefly elaborating that all [[jokes]] contain status shifts [http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5550134133036374310]. Stephen Colbert is a [[The Colbert Report|satirical television pundit]] who plays the character of a [[Conservatism|conservative]], whose views contradict the actor's. |
[[Stephen Colbert]] used the phrase in a taped interview with Harvard students in [[December 2006]], briefly elaborating that all [[jokes]] contain status shifts [http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5550134133036374310]. Stephen Colbert is a [[The Colbert Report|satirical television pundit]] who plays the character of a [[Conservatism|conservative]], whose views contradict the actor's. |
||
Revision as of 13:49, 4 October 2010
 |
 | This article may be confusing or unclear to readers. (December 2006) |
A status shift is the transition from one social status to another one. Some statuses are mutually exclusive, like military or civilian, laicos or religious, noble or commoner. Other statuses are not mutually exclusive, but contextual. One of the identities might be used in certain settings, while the other is used in different settings where the other status is unfavorable, undesirable, or unnecessary.
Stephen Colbert used the phrase in a taped interview with Harvard students in December 2006, briefly elaborating that all jokes contain status shifts [1]. Stephen Colbert is a satirical television pundit who plays the character of a conservative, whose views contradict the actor's.
This is called situational negotiation of social identity; when ethnic identity is flexible and situational, it can become an achieved status. Shifting ethnic affiliations is when an ethnic group may move through levels of culture as they negotiate their identities. Ascribed status is associated with a position in the social–political hierarchy in many societies. Minority groups with inferior power and less secure access to resources are subordinate to majority groups. Ethnic groups help create races; in turn, discrimination against such a group is called racism.