Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lily Thai: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:48, 4 October 2010

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2009 June 13.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The "keep" arguments are comparatively weak: Something might sound notable, but there are no reliable sources to back that up. Saying that the article shows notability is vague and does not give much more insight than just a vote. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:57, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lily Thai

Fails WP:PORNBIO. Hardcore gossip site unreliable to establish notability. Morbidthoughts (talk) 18:03, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No references to support notability Triplestop (talk) 18:28, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As Morbidthoughts says, fails PORNBIO. And I would like to point out that while she has been nominated for AVN awards, it appears she was nominated only in 2005 according to my records (Best New Starlet, Best All-Girl Sex Scene – Video and Best Tease Performance) and PORNBIO requires nominations in multiple years. Tabercil (talk) 21:05, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Being nominated for Best New Starlet sounds notable to me.SPNic (talk) 01:23, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:16, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 16:50, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Article shows notability. --Maverx (talk) 03:43, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 ===[[Lily Thai]]===
-:{{la|Lily Thai}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Lily Thai|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lily Thai]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles forbility [[User:Triplestop|Triplestop]] ([[User talk:Triplestop|talk]]) 18:28, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
+:{{la|Lily Thai}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Lily Thai|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lily Thai]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lily Thai|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 June 5#{{anchorencode:Lily Thai}}|View log]])</noinclude>
+Fails [[WP:PORNBIO]]. Hardcore gossip site unreliable to establish notability. [[User:Morbidthoughts|Morbidthoughts]] ([[User talk:Morbidthoughts|talk]]) 18:03, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' No references to support notability [[User:Triplestop|Triplestop]] ([[User talk:Triplestop|talk]]) 18:28, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 *'''Delete'''. As Morbidthoughts says, fails PORNBIO. And I would like to point out that while she has been nominated for AVN awards, it appears she was nominated only in 2005 according to my records (Best New Starlet, Best All-Girl Sex Scene – Video and Best Tease Performance) and PORNBIO requires nominations in multiple years. [[User:Tabercil|Tabercil]] ([[User talk:Tabercil|talk]]) 21:05, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 *'''Keep'''.  Being nominated for Best New Starlet sounds notable to me.[[User:SPNic|SPNic]] ([[User talk:SPNic|talk]]) 01:23, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Actors and filmmakers|list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- [[User:Fabrictramp|<font color="#228b22" face="comic sans ms">Fabrictramp</font>]] | [[User talk:Fabrictramp|<font color="#960018" face="Papyrus">talk to me</font>]] 21:16, 5 June 2009 (UTC)</small>
+*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Living people|list of Living people-related deletion discussions]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 00:01, 6 June 2009 (UTC)</small>
+* <span style="font-size: 85%;">Note: This debate has been added to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography|WikiProject Pornography]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography/Deletion|list of deletions]]. [[User:Morbidthoughts|Morbidthoughts]] ([[User talk:Morbidthoughts|talk]]) 16:50, 7 June 2009 (UTC)</span>
 *'''Keep''' - Article shows notability. --[[User:Maverx|Maverx]] ([[User talk:Maverx|talk]]) 03:43, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
-ghgjiuoguogyuiogy8uihgyuhhjghyuihguyuhhb
 :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>