Jump to content

User talk:Jlambert: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
online creation warning
Line 48: Line 48:


: OK, I'm convinced. Thanks for providing that. *Please* bear in mind for the future that admins don't usually trawl through the talk page and aren't familiar with who-is-who - you have to help us. [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 21:52, 11 February 2006 (UTC).
: OK, I'm convinced. Thanks for providing that. *Please* bear in mind for the future that admins don't usually trawl through the talk page and aren't familiar with who-is-who - you have to help us. [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 21:52, 11 February 2006 (UTC).

== online creation warning ==

[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|30px]] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] a page, you ''will'' be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. <!-- Template:Test4 (Fourth level warning) --> [[User:68.162.148.34|68.162.148.34]] 02:13, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:13, 15 February 2006

Welcome!

Hello, Jlambert, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Dr Debug (Talk) 15:25, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Online creation

Thanks for expanding the stub-type stuff in the article, it's very much appreciated. --Atari2600tim 21:47, 7 February 2006 (UTC) (Tim/Timbo/cmdrkeen2/atari2600tim)[reply]

3rr on Online creation

By my count, you have now got 5R on OC. There the defence of "I was reverting sockpuppets" requires good proof, which I don't think you have. You will be blocked (by me, if not by someone else) unless you promise here and now to stop. William M. Connolley 19:49, 11 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]

You just blocked the user, and a brand new anonymous user shows up to vandalize the page again. Now they've just reverted someone else who restored the page. *shrug* Jlambert 20:19, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That wasn't the asnwer I was looking for, so you're blocked [1]. Now, please be good, promise to abide by WP:3RR, and I'll unblock you. William M. Connolley 20:33, 11 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]
I haven't done anything at all since you messaged me here.
Please read my original message to you carefully. William M. Connolley 20:48, 11 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Is this proof enough?
The new reverting user who claims "I am not Locke" and reverts the page with no discussion is in fact the user's webhosting site:
whois -h whois.internic.net 66.101.59.248 ...
Whois Server Version 1.3
Domain names in the .com and .net domains can now be registered
with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net
for detailed information.
   Server Name: GARY.MUGS.NET
   IP Address: 66.101.59.248

http://www.mugs.net/~locke/

OK, you're going to have to help me here. You have demonstrated that "Locke" is associated with "66.101.59.248", which rather suggests that 66.101.59.248 is not being truthful when asserting that they are not Locke. But... bearing in mind that I don't know this history of any of this, or who is associated with who, what does that prove? William M. Connolley 20:48, 11 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Okay the user you blocked because of the complaints from atari2600tim and Ehheh was 68.162.148.34. if you look at the talk page[2] you'll see they are one and the same as they've signed some of their replies. For example... Much of Armageddon's code was influenced through a collaboration between Morgenes of Aldara and I. OLC was first distributed to those folks as early as 1992. Thoric and Atari2600tim may be arguing that "online creation" was available as late as "1994" but the reality is that the code in Armageddon and in Aldara were both influenced by me, Locke. 68.162.148.34 13:54, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
Yes I will stop reverting, but this Eggster/68.162.148.34/66.101.59.248/Locke is the same person. See also [3]
Thanks. That's all I can say about it.

You're unblocked [4]; please be good! Now I'll examine your evidence. William M. Connolley 21:49, 11 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]

OK, I'm convinced. Thanks for providing that. *Please* bear in mind for the future that admins don't usually trawl through the talk page and aren't familiar with who-is-who - you have to help us. William M. Connolley 21:52, 11 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]

online creation warning

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 68.162.148.34 02:13, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]