Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Jenni-Lyn Watson: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Crime|list of Crime-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Jclemens-public|Jclemens-public]] ([[User talk:Jclemens-public|talk]]) 07:32, 29 November 2010 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Crime|list of Crime-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Jclemens-public|Jclemens-public]] ([[User talk:Jclemens-public|talk]]) 07:32, 29 November 2010 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Weak keep'''. As the subject may relate to [[missing white woman syndrome]] and possibly for that reason has received national media coverage, that should suffice to satisfy our [[WP:GNG|general notability requirements]]. I agree that the article may resemble an obituary as the level of detailing of the victim's life does appear exaggerated given the relevant focus at what would constitute notability for it as a Wikipedia article. However, that is not an argument for deletion. I also believe that NOTNEWS should ''probably'' not come to use here, but I'm a bit unsure. __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 09:36, 29 November 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Weak keep'''. As the subject may relate to [[missing white woman syndrome]] and possibly for that reason has received national media coverage, that should suffice to satisfy our [[WP:GNG|general notability requirements]]. I agree that the article may resemble an obituary as the level of detailing of the victim's life does appear exaggerated given the relevant focus at what would constitute notability for it as a Wikipedia article. However, that is not an argument for deletion. I also believe that NOTNEWS should ''probably'' not come to use here, but I'm a bit unsure. __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 09:36, 29 November 2010 (UTC) |
||
*''' keep''' - notable case. heard alot about it.--[[Special:Contributions/195.84.41.1|195.84.41.1]] ([[User talk:195.84.41.1|talk]]) 10:54, 29 November 2010 (UTC) |
*''' keep''' - notable case. heard alot about it. it is inside the that should suffice to satisfy our [[WP:GNG|general notability requirements]]. --[[Special:Contributions/195.84.41.1|195.84.41.1]] ([[User talk:195.84.41.1|talk]]) 10:54, 29 November 2010 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 10:56, 29 November 2010
- Death of Jenni-Lyn Watson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
as per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:EVENT. "Editors should bear in mind recentism, the tendency for new and current matters to seem more important than they might seem in a few years time. Many events receive coverage in the news and yet are not of historic or lasting importance". unfortunately people disappear all the time and get murdered by ex-partners, don't see how this merits a WP article. LibStar (talk) 05:59, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NOTMEMORIAL and not obituary. 76.66.194.128 (talk) 06:02, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. For an event to be notable it is required to have lasting coverage extending significantly beyond the event, or be a significant and well-discussed precursor to or result of another notable event. - DustFormsWords (talk) 06:19, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:32, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:32, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Weak keep. As the subject may relate to missing white woman syndrome and possibly for that reason has received national media coverage, that should suffice to satisfy our general notability requirements. I agree that the article may resemble an obituary as the level of detailing of the victim's life does appear exaggerated given the relevant focus at what would constitute notability for it as a Wikipedia article. However, that is not an argument for deletion. I also believe that NOTNEWS should probably not come to use here, but I'm a bit unsure. __meco (talk) 09:36, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- keep - notable case. heard alot about it. it is inside the that should suffice to satisfy our general notability requirements. --195.84.41.1 (talk) 10:54, 29 November 2010 (UTC)