Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/85th Hakone Ekiden: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion for 85th Hakone Ekiden
 
Line 5: Line 5:
:({{Find sources|85th Hakone Ekiden}})
:({{Find sources|85th Hakone Ekiden}})
Came across this article while looking at older articles that need Wikification. [[WP:NOT|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information]], and at first I wasn't even sure what the data listed was - the article is a collection of tables full of data, describing what appears to be the second most recent event. There's no assertion that the 85th event was notable, and the lack of a page for the 86th seems to only further confirm this. [[User:JPG-GR|JPG-GR]] ([[User talk:JPG-GR|talk]]) 08:13, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Came across this article while looking at older articles that need Wikification. [[WP:NOT|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information]], and at first I wasn't even sure what the data listed was - the article is a collection of tables full of data, describing what appears to be the second most recent event. There's no assertion that the 85th event was notable, and the lack of a page for the 86th seems to only further confirm this. [[User:JPG-GR|JPG-GR]] ([[User talk:JPG-GR|talk]]) 08:13, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
*''Delete.'' I agree. It seems like all the notable information about this event is already recorded on [[Hakone Ekiden]]. This is just miscellaneous errata. --[[User:Strangerer|Strangerer]] <small>([[User_talk:Strangerer|Talk]])</small> 09:52, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:52, 12 December 2010

85th Hakone Ekiden (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Came across this article while looking at older articles that need Wikification. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, and at first I wasn't even sure what the data listed was - the article is a collection of tables full of data, describing what appears to be the second most recent event. There's no assertion that the 85th event was notable, and the lack of a page for the 86th seems to only further confirm this. JPG-GR (talk) 08:13, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]