User talk:Kotniski: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 7d) to User talk:Kotniski/Archive 6. |
→Flat Earth and NPOV: new section |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
::Yes - by making her so prominent you have made it appear that there are no other possible contenders for the title "Queen Anne". [[User:Deb|Deb]] ([[User talk:Deb|talk]]) 12:12, 17 December 2010 (UTC) |
::Yes - by making her so prominent you have made it appear that there are no other possible contenders for the title "Queen Anne". [[User:Deb|Deb]] ([[User talk:Deb|talk]]) 12:12, 17 December 2010 (UTC) |
||
:::Well there aren't - except the architecture one you mentioned, which I'e made much ''more'' prominent than it was before. I thought you'd be pleased.--[[User:Kotniski|Kotniski]] ([[User talk:Kotniski#top|talk]]) 12:13, 17 December 2010 (UTC) |
:::Well there aren't - except the architecture one you mentioned, which I'e made much ''more'' prominent than it was before. I thought you'd be pleased.--[[User:Kotniski|Kotniski]] ([[User talk:Kotniski#top|talk]]) 12:13, 17 December 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Flat Earth and NPOV == |
|||
Dear Mr. Kotniski, I have a discussion about adding minority experiments to scientific articles at [[Talk:Tests_of_general_relativity#Mercury_precession_-_minority_test]]. I would appreciate your positive input here. Basically, my point is that most scientific experiments start out with only a minority of scientists being aware of the research. I would like to start adding verified scientific research to scientific articles on Wiki, but they will only have a significant minority when added (i.e. like 1% of the scientific community with prominant scientists included).[[Special:Contributions/72.241.181.142|72.241.181.142]] ([[User talk:72.241.181.142|talk]]) 17:08, 20 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:08, 20 December 2010
| Talk page policy: I dislike seeing only one side of a discussion on a page. If I put a message on your talk page, I will be watching that page for a reply. If you leave a message here, I will reply here, unless you request otherwise. |
|---|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
The Signpost: 13 December 2010
- Rencontres Wikimédia: Wikimedia and the cultural sector: two days of talks in Paris.
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Algae
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: The community has spoken
- Arbitration report: Requested amendment re Pseudoscience case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:09, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Queen Anne
Once again your changes to this article are designed to support your false belief that Queen Anne is the primary topic. Deb (talk) 08:40, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- Don't know what you mean really - do you have any other suggestion as to how to format it? Certainly out of the queens, this one is the primary topic (for the phrase "Queen Anne", I mean), but as you say, the architectural style is also quite likely to be what people are looking for under that phrase, so I rearranged the page so that that topic came right at the top after the queen herself. Do you see any remaining problems? --Kotniski (talk) 11:19, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yes - by making her so prominent you have made it appear that there are no other possible contenders for the title "Queen Anne". Deb (talk) 12:12, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- Well there aren't - except the architecture one you mentioned, which I'e made much more prominent than it was before. I thought you'd be pleased.--Kotniski (talk) 12:13, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yes - by making her so prominent you have made it appear that there are no other possible contenders for the title "Queen Anne". Deb (talk) 12:12, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Flat Earth and NPOV
Dear Mr. Kotniski, I have a discussion about adding minority experiments to scientific articles at Talk:Tests_of_general_relativity#Mercury_precession_-_minority_test. I would appreciate your positive input here. Basically, my point is that most scientific experiments start out with only a minority of scientists being aware of the research. I would like to start adding verified scientific research to scientific articles on Wiki, but they will only have a significant minority when added (i.e. like 1% of the scientific community with prominant scientists included).72.241.181.142 (talk) 17:08, 20 December 2010 (UTC)