Talk:Cineworld Glasgow: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:50, 30 December 2010

Scotland Unassessed

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This is a wiki entry for a first year university project, the page will be updated with relevant information on the subject. Please do not Mark for deletion.

If it meets deletion criteria it will be deleted - marked or not. Your prof must have read WP:SUP first. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:24, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

why would this meet deletion criteria? The page was marked for deletion after 3 minutes of creation. Just curious ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ross.gallagher27 (talk • contribs) 12:52, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First, it fails WP:CORP. Second, it's only claim to notability is "the tallest cinema", which is truly weak. Finally, the only third party reliable source was the company's own website, which is not valid as a source. Editors should draft articles in their own userspace, as any "live" article is subject to all the policies and regulations - it's not a test place, and should never be used for such things as school projects. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:57, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

'tallest cinema' is very far from being 'weak'! Behave yourself. --78.101.62.79 (talk) 10:50, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

COI

As a result of the conflict of interest demonstrated by the discussion on this talk page, I've placed a COI tag; there has been a lot of promotional material and a lot of unencyclopaedic material. This could use a good going-over by some uninvolved editors, I think. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 10:28, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll make a start. --78.101.62.79 (talk) 10:49, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

British English

Being an article on a cinema in Scotland, should British English be used in this article? I note that there was a comment about a glass elevator (which I removed as being rather irrelevant) which suggested that it had been written in American English. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 21:10, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 : why would this meet deletion criteria? The page was marked for deletion after 3 minutes of creation. Just curious ?  <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ross.gallagher27|Ross.gallagher27]] ([[User talk:Ross.gallagher27|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ross.gallagher27|contribs]]) 12:52, 17 November 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 :: First, it fails [[WP:CORP]].  Second, it's only claim to [[WP:GNG|notability]] is "the tallest cinema", which is truly weak.  Finally, the only [[WP:RS|third party reliable source]] was the company's own website, which is not valid as a source.  Editors should draft articles in their own [[WP:SANDBOX|userspace]], as any "live" article is subject to all the policies and regulations - it's not a test place, and should never be used for such things as school projects. ([[User talk:Bwilkins|<font style="font-variant:small-caps">talk→</font>]]<span style="border:1px solid black;">'''&nbsp;[[User:Bwilkins|BWilkins]]&nbsp;'''</span>[[Special:Contributions/Bwilkins|<font style="font-variant:small-caps">←track</font>]]) 12:57, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
+'tallest cinema' is very far from being 'weak'! Behave yourself. --[[Special:Contributions/78.101.62.79|78.101.62.79]] ([[User talk:78.101.62.79|talk]]) 10:50, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 == COI ==