Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fingerpoke of Doom (3rd nomination): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion for Fingerpoke of Doom (3rd nomination)
 
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
:{{la|Fingerpoke of Doom}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fingerpoke of Doom (3rd nomination)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 December 30#{{anchorencode:Fingerpoke of Doom}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
:{{la|Fingerpoke of Doom}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fingerpoke of Doom (3rd nomination)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 December 30#{{anchorencode:Fingerpoke of Doom}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
:({{Find sources|Fingerpoke of Doom}})
:({{Find sources|Fingerpoke of Doom}})
Article is pure [[WP:OR]] and [[WP:POV]]. reliable Sources exist, but do not back up what the Article claims they do. I have added various {{citation needed}} tags which have gone ignored. In addition, various Reliable Sources have been found(and added) which completely debunk the article's claims. Further, this may completely fail [[WP:N]]. The article has been deleted twice before. The first time the result was "no consensus". It was then (re)nominated, and survived, due to more votes for "Keep" than for "Delete". However, since Wikipedia is not a popularity contest, i have remoninated the Article, due to its lack of Sources which back up the claims, and its being made from whole cloth. Also, anyone checking Webster's, OED, or dictionary/com will discover that there is not, nor has ever been such a word as "Fingerpoke". The term is only used by ONE of the various Sources, Reliable or not. It is fairly popular with the Internet Wrestling Community though. [[Special:Contributions/41.133.47.252|41.133.47.252]] ([[User talk:41.133.47.252|talk]]) 14:53, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Article is pure OR and POV. reliable Sources exist, but do not back up what the Article claims they do

Revision as of 14:53, 30 December 2010

Fingerpoke of Doom

Fingerpoke of Doom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is pure WP:OR and WP:POV. reliable Sources exist, but do not back up what the Article claims they do. I have added various [citation needed] tags which have gone ignored. In addition, various Reliable Sources have been found(and added) which completely debunk the article's claims. Further, this may completely fail WP:N. The article has been deleted twice before. The first time the result was "no consensus". It was then (re)nominated, and survived, due to more votes for "Keep" than for "Delete". However, since Wikipedia is not a popularity contest, i have remoninated the Article, due to its lack of Sources which back up the claims, and its being made from whole cloth. Also, anyone checking Webster's, OED, or dictionary/com will discover that there is not, nor has ever been such a word as "Fingerpoke". The term is only used by ONE of the various Sources, Reliable or not. It is fairly popular with the Internet Wrestling Community though. 41.133.47.252 (talk) 14:53, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]