User talk:Hakkapeliitta: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:07, 11 January 2011

Welcome to the 2011 WikiCup!

Hello, happy new year and welcome to the 2011 WikiCup! Your submissions' page can be found here and instructions of how to update the page can be found here and on the submissions' page itself. From the submissions' page, a bot will update the main scoresheet. Our rules have been very slightly updated from last year; the full rules can be found here. Please remember that you can only receive points for content on which you have done significant work in 2011; nominations of work from last year and "drive-by" nominations will not be awarded points. Signups are going to remain open through January, so if you know of anyone who would like to take part, please direct them to Wikipedia:WikiCup/2011 signups. The judges can be contacted on the WikiCup talk page, on their respective talk pages, or by email. Other than that, we will be in contact at the end of every month with the newsletter. If you want to stop or start receiving newsletters, please remove your name from or add your name to this list. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 18:31, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A Belated Welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Hakkapeliitta. I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help one get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! —Ute in DC (talk) 22:37, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 I hope you enjoy editing here and being a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedian]]! Also, when you post on [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk pages]] you should [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|sign your name]] on talk pages using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
 If you need help, check out [[Wikipedia:Questions]], ask me on {{#if: |[[User talk:{{{1}}}|my talk page]]|my talk page}}, or place {{tl|helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! {{#if:|&#32;{{{3}}}|}} —[[User:Ute in DC|Ute in DC]] ([[User talk:Ute in DC|talk]]) 22:37, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
-== 3RR on 2011 Tucson shooting ==
-<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' temporarily from editing for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]].  Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}} below this notice, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. <p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Page protection|page protection]].</p></div><!-- Template:uw-block --><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> [[User:Titoxd|Tito<span style="color:#008000;">xd</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Titoxd|?!?]] - [[WP:FAC|cool stuff]])</sup> 22:13, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
-You've done this in error.  I listed to bold revert discuss.  I discussed why the address is important.  I then tried different ways, like in the infobox, in the text but only as an intersection.  I didn't do the same thing 3 times.  But I see why you are mad and will comply. [[User:Hakkapeliitta|Hakkapeliitta]] ([[User talk:Hakkapeliitta#top|talk]]) 22:38, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
-{{unblock reviewed | 1=I was not notified until after the block. Please unblock and I will edit something else. Everything I added has a source. Some people are mad but most of them don't discuss it. For example, the latest CNN report says that Giffords is communicating. One editor said that it didn't make sense (but didn't read the CNN reference) and just removed the info. If you unblock, this will set the stage for good relations. Try to make excuses and you will just make people, like me, mad. Remember, I said if unblocked, I won't edit Tucson today. Please be nice, not nasty. | decline=You've been clearly warned for edit warring at least three times now.  Threats indicate that unblocking you would be a poor idea. [[User:Kuru|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#cd853f; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">Kuru</span>]] [[User talk:Kuru|<span style="color:#f5deb3">''(talk)''</span>]] 22:23, 9 January 2011 (UTC)}}
-: (ec) To expand on that: You have added that particular piece of information at least four times to the article. Your change still had no consensus, but you tried to get your way through persistency. That is edit warring, and you quite certainly were warned about that.<br>An indirect threat "unblock me, or you'll make me mad" is not a good way to get unblocked. You need to show that this won't be a problem again. [[User talk:Amalthea|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#832">Amalthea</span>]] 22:30, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
-{{unblock reviewed | 1=Again, the unblock request was refused saying it is a threat. It is NOT a threat. Unblock me in good faith and I will show similar good faith in not editing Tucson. Such good faith sets the tone for good feelings and good relations. Besides, if I don't do as I say, that would show that I am an asshole. I am not an asshole. So please show good faith by unblocking and I will should extreme restraint and politeness. Please don't try to show your power. Thank you. | decline=I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
-*the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, <u>or</u>
-*the block is no longer necessary because you
-*#understand what you have been blocked for,
-*#will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
-*#will make useful contributions instead.
-Please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] for more information. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 22:50, 9 January 2011 (UTC)}}