User talk:Joe Decker: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 3 thread(s) (older than 11d) to User talk:Joe Decker/Archive 3. |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
{{talkback|1=NYKevin}} |
{{talkback|1=NYKevin}} |
||
Hello Joe Decker. |
|||
Can you please stop taking down the site I am working on for my job. |
|||
I work for the designer Nicole Miller and have been straddled with working on the wiki page. I am trying to go through and cite everything now, even though I have no idea what I am doing! |
|||
== Speedy deletion declined: [[:Tainan (disambiguation)]] == |
== Speedy deletion declined: [[:Tainan (disambiguation)]] == |
||
Revision as of 17:47, 17 January 2011
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 11 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello Joe Decker. Can you please stop taking down the site I am working on for my job. I work for the designer Nicole Miller and have been straddled with working on the wiki page. I am trying to go through and cite everything now, even though I have no idea what I am doing!
Speedy deletion declined: Tainan (disambiguation)
Hello Joe Decker. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Tainan (disambiguation), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There does not appear to have been a merger. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 07:26, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Not a problem, thanks for the note! There was a bit of a clusterfoo there between several .. ah, nevermind. You did the right thing. Thanks. :) --j⚛e deckertalk 07:29, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks
You were fast, I was still looking up how to mark it. Wee Curry Monster talk 00:16, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- Glad to! I catch a fair number of those sourcing unsourced BLPs, and still have to look up the funny subst expression every time. --j⚛e deckertalk 00:20, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
I've substantially rewritten this article and referenced nearly everything in it. I can't verify a couple of minor items about his football career, but it turns out that's not why he's notable. Please take a look at the new article. If you agree that he now passes WP:N and WP:V please consider revising your contributions to the deletion discussion. Thanks! Pburka (talk) 18:16, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
- You're right, I blew my reading of that entirely, I thought the con man and the football/CIA guy were separate individuals, which (as per your sources) isn't the case. Well done! Thanks! --j⚛e deckertalk 18:33, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
- I have to admit I don't have a solid reference saying they're the same person. But they're both the same age, both from Milwaukee and both connected to Marquette University. We also know that Ron Rewald, the con-man, ran a sporting goods store in Milwaukee in the 1970s, which fits quite well. The unreliable http://www.kycbs.net/Rewald.htm also claims they're the same. It's pretty clear that the article was created by the subject; my guess is that he's trying to rehabilitate his name a bit. Pburka (talk) 19:55, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
- Indeed, and at this point, whether the con man played/was signed to football is a relatively minor content issue. Thanks! Have a great weekend! --j⚛e deckertalk 20:49, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
- I have to admit I don't have a solid reference saying they're the same person. But they're both the same age, both from Milwaukee and both connected to Marquette University. We also know that Ron Rewald, the con-man, ran a sporting goods store in Milwaukee in the 1970s, which fits quite well. The unreliable http://www.kycbs.net/Rewald.htm also claims they're the same. It's pretty clear that the article was created by the subject; my guess is that he's trying to rehabilitate his name a bit. Pburka (talk) 19:55, 8 January 2011 (UTC)