Jump to content

User talk:71.65.71.145: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 18: Line 18:
* If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's [[WP:ANI|Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]].
* If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's [[WP:ANI|Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]].
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. Continuing to edit disruptively '''may result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]].'''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive3 --> You appear to be engaged in an edit war which involves putting undue weight on some matters in the introduction and is against consensus. Raise it on the talk page. [[User:PatGallacher|PatGallacher]] ([[User talk:PatGallacher|talk]]) 16:48, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. Continuing to edit disruptively '''may result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]].'''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive3 --> You appear to be engaged in an edit war which involves putting undue weight on some matters in the introduction and is against consensus. Raise it on the talk page. [[User:PatGallacher|PatGallacher]] ([[User talk:PatGallacher|talk]]) 16:48, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

:Um, I am trying to discuss it. They aren't. [[Special:Contributions/71.65.71.145|71.65.71.145]] ([[User talk:71.65.71.145#top|talk]]) 18:00, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:00, 23 January 2011

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Taliban. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. This is sourced content, and you would need to discuss deletion on the Talk page. Rodhullandemu 21:46, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2011

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Vladimir Lenin has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Please do not revert another editor using a false claim of "reverting vandalism". RolandR (talk) 21:03, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vladimir Lenin. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive; until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.RolandR (talk) 15:11, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you should follow your own advice. I have offered to discuss this with you from the very beginning, but you ignored me. 71.65.71.145 (talk) 16:32, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Vladimir Lenin. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. You appear to be engaged in an edit war which involves putting undue weight on some matters in the introduction and is against consensus. Raise it on the talk page. PatGallacher (talk) 16:48, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Um, I am trying to discuss it. They aren't. 71.65.71.145 (talk) 18:00, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]