User talk:Anaxial

Lancashire

dear anaxial you said my edits appear to be incorrect well i just want to tell you they are not.they are 100% correct. if you carry on removing my edits i will use a more correct source of informaton,because if wikipedia believes that Greater Manchester is a county they arenot only wrong but really unuseful.Greater Manchester is not a County. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.8.193.141 (talk) 20:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

You're confusing me with someone else. I only reverted your edit stating that Bolton is 1,500 feet above sea level, which you failed to provide a citation for. If you have a citation, all you need to do is provide it in the article. On the other hand, if you do have a concern with the accuracy of the Greater Manchester article, the best place to have that discussion would be on that article's talk page - it has nothing to do with me. Anaxial (talk) 20:10, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Lancashire

anaxial i am really sorry,i thought you meant to correct me about Counties,sorry about that i hope ive not affended you,your right about the height above sea level i know it would be aout 1,500 i know its in the West Pennine Moors,so it is high up.sorry about before

Smash Court Tennis

Dude why, why did you do this to me analaxle, why? It was a constructive edit!

5041

I have man whore don't discriminateque. !!!

Hercule Poirot is french

I made an edit to an article from Begalian to french and you say its vandalism? Why? 90.200.233.212 (talk) 23:10, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

• Because it isn't true. If you have sources that say it is true, by all means cite them in the article, as I said in my message on your talk page. Anaxial (talk) 23:12, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism#What_is_not_vandalism that isn't vandalism.

"Misinformation, accidental A user who, in good faith, adds content to an article that is factually inaccurate but in the belief that it is accurate is trying to contribute to and improve Wikipedia, not vandalize it. If you believe inaccurate information has been added to an article in good faith, remove it once you are certain it is inaccurate, or discuss its factuality with the user who has added it." 90.200.233.212 (talk) 23:17, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

• The notice I placed on your page simply states that your edit appeared to have added incorrect information to the article. That's an accurate statement, and the edit would have had to be reverted anyway. Anaxial (talk) 23:22, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
• Yes but I noticed the thing in page history, "Reverted 2 edits by 90.200.233.212 (talk) identified as vandalism to last revision by Siepe. using TW" 90.200.233.212 (talk) 23:32, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Fantastic Four

The death of (at least) one of the Fantastic Four has been hyped up for MONTHS now. The fact that it still doesn't have a single mention on the Fantastic Four page, the day before the comic's release, is ridiculous. I didn't source it properly and I don't know exactly what would be a reliable source here, or what the proper way to cite it would be, but a quick Google search can prove that I'm not just pulling this out of my arse. I'm not going to repost what I posted before, but you should probably add back that information in some form, with whatever sources are deemed adequate here on Wikipedia. 74.88.212.242 (talk) 01:37, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

I'm not suggesting its vandalism, but this sort of thing (like anything on Wikipedia, really) does need a source, especially since it hasn't actually happened yet. If it's been reported everywhere, I don't see how it can be difficult to find somewhere reliable that mentions it.Anaxial (talk) 06:03, 25 January 2011 (UTC)