Talk:Feral Tribune: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Timbouctou (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
→Trainwreck: new section |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Croatia|class=Start|importance=Mid}} |
{{WikiProject Croatia|class=Start|importance=Mid}} |
||
{{JournProjectArticles}} |
{{JournProjectArticles}} |
||
== Trainwreck == |
|||
This article is a trainwreck. |
|||
Why? |
|||
The two largest sections of it have barely any citations. |
|||
Also, I get the vibe of a romanticized portrayal of the magazine. |
|||
Is this really something you would find in an encyclopedia? |
|||
How is Wikipedia supposed to be taken seriously with articles like this? |
|||
Please, clean this rubbish dump up. Timbouctou or whoever. |
|||
This is coming from someone who read the weekly magazine for years. |
|||
Thanks. |
|||
Revision as of 12:39, 28 January 2011
 | Croatia Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Trainwreck
This article is a trainwreck. Why? The two largest sections of it have barely any citations. Also, I get the vibe of a romanticized portrayal of the magazine. Is this really something you would find in an encyclopedia? How is Wikipedia supposed to be taken seriously with articles like this? Please, clean this rubbish dump up. Timbouctou or whoever. This is coming from someone who read the weekly magazine for years. Thanks.