Jump to content

Talk:Park Ji-sung/GA1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
failing
Line 40: Line 40:


*Following discussion with the nominator, I am failing this article as the issues will not be resolved in time. --[[User:Sarastro1|Sarastro1]] ([[User talk:Sarastro1|talk]]) 18:46, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
*Following discussion with the nominator, I am failing this article as the issues will not be resolved in time. --[[User:Sarastro1|Sarastro1]] ([[User talk:Sarastro1|talk]]) 18:46, 25 July 2010 (UTC)







== awards ==

why do you mention 2nd, 3rd and 4th place in international events but not so in domestic tournaments/leagues

retards.

Revision as of 21:19, 31 January 2011

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sarastro1 (talk) 10:38, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, this article has several issues at the moment, all of which would prevent it from becoming a GA. I am prepared to place it on hold for one week for some improvements, but I will not carry out a full review until these issues have been sorted. I notice that the nominator is not a contributor to the article, which may mean that changes cannot be made in time. If you do not think changes can be made in time, I will have to fail it.

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

The main issue is with sourcing. Large parts of the article are not sourced despite claims which could be challenged. Just to give a few examples, "Although he was born in the South Korean capital, Seoul, Park grew up in Suwon, a satellite city 30 kilometres (19 mi) south of Seoul"; "by the end of 2003–04 season, Park had begun to adapt to the Netherlands, both on and off the field"; "On 1 March 2008, Park scored his first Premiership goal of the 2007–08 season after returning from his long-term injury against Fulham." Also, whole paragraphs (e.g. Early career, International career) are uncited.

There are parts which I do not consider to be neutral; e.g. "Park is able to play anywhere across the midfield and is noted for his exceptional fitness level, discipline, work ethic and movement."; "the highlight of Park's PSV career came when he scored the first goal against Italian team A.C. Milan at the Champions League semi-finals"; "Park scored a crucial winner in the derby against Liverpool"; "Park scored a memorable goal during the 2002 World Cup".

I am also concerned by the stability of the article; there seems to be a lot of vandalism and arguably an edit war. For example here. I would need reassurance on this point.

If required, I can give more specific instances of these problems, but there are so many, I cannot realistically list all of them. The article needs a thorough copy-edit before it receives a full review. I have not considered other areas such as prose or sourcing yet until these major issues are resolved.




awards

why do you mention 2nd, 3rd and 4th place in international events but not so in domestic tournaments/leagues

retards.