Talk:Twang!!: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by Damslattery - "→Reviewing: " |
Damslattery (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:The article has been expanded, but still has a long way to go. It must also provide verifiable sources.[[User: auawise|<font size="2.5" color="blue">Λua∫</font>]][[User:auawise|<font color="red">Wi</font>]][[User:auawise|<font color="gray">se</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Auawise|talk]])</small></sup> 15:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC) |
:The article has been expanded, but still has a long way to go. It must also provide verifiable sources.[[User: auawise|<font size="2.5" color="blue">Λua∫</font>]][[User:auawise|<font color="red">Wi</font>]][[User:auawise|<font color="gray">se</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Auawise|talk]])</small></sup> 15:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
If only anonymous from January 2011 could have addressed the perceived "inappropriate tone for Wikipedia" on this page? Without any constructive suggestions and failing to identify themselves- I am going to remove the posting they left on the page. |
:If only the anonymous editor from January 2011 could have addressed the perceived "inappropriate tone for Wikipedia" on this page? Without any constructive suggestions and failing to identify themselves- I am going to remove the posting they left on the page. --DamienSlattery 21:07, 26 February 2011 (UTC) [[User:Damslattery|Damslattery]] |
Revision as of 21:07, 26 February 2011
Reviewing
This is a very short article providing no content to the reader, and not enough (if any) google/yahoo hits. Λua∫Wise (talk) 15:01, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "not enough (if any) google/yahoo hits." Twang! is famous in theatrical history. If you type "bart" and "twang" (avoiding unrelated uses of the word) there are thousands of hits. --Paul B (talk) 11:09, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- The article has been expanded, but still has a long way to go. It must also provide verifiable sources.Λua∫Wise (talk) 15:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- If only the anonymous editor from January 2011 could have addressed the perceived "inappropriate tone for Wikipedia" on this page? Without any constructive suggestions and failing to identify themselves- I am going to remove the posting they left on the page. --DamienSlattery 21:07, 26 February 2011 (UTC) Damslattery