User talk:PhilKnight: Difference between revisions
PhilKnight (talk | contribs) →Appendix: reply |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:Have a look at [[WP:AUTHOR]] - does the subject meet the requirements? If so, then you could recreate the article, and include references which demonstrate this. [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight#top|talk]]) 21:22, 28 February 2011 (UTC) |
:Have a look at [[WP:AUTHOR]] - does the subject meet the requirements? If so, then you could recreate the article, and include references which demonstrate this. [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight#top|talk]]) 21:22, 28 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
== what does this means ?== |
|||
You write: |
|||
:Use of the site for other purposes, such as advocacy or propaganda, furtherance of outside conflicts, publishing or promoting original research, and political or ideological struggle, is prohibited.' which is essentially similar. |
|||
Do you really think I am doing all this? If so, why? All I am trying to do is to write an article about Kendrick analysis. [[User:Kehrli|Kehrli]] ([[User talk:Kehrli|talk]]) 02:19, 2 March 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:19, 2 March 2011
 Archives |
|---|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115
|
| edit |
Mohannad
Requesting unprotection on the Mohannad page please, to make an article on the name, and list bearers of the name. John Cengiz talk 00:27, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- Hi John, I've unprotected the page. PhilKnight (talk) 00:29, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- Cheers Phil. John Cengiz talk 00:44, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Appendix
Requesting ability to edit the Appendix page, there is hearsay and there isn't scientific proof, so it needs to be changed. Wikipedia is about facts, and I wish for it to stay that way.
SageKalzi (talk) 20:40, 28 February 2011 (UTC)SageKalzi
- You can make a request at Requests for page protection. Incidentally, I was mildly amused by this edit. PhilKnight (talk) 21:24, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi i was wondering to what purpose was "alex duval" deleted, it was put up for a specific purpose, and then five minutes later it was taken down. I would like to see this page put back up.
- Have a look at WP:AUTHOR - does the subject meet the requirements? If so, then you could recreate the article, and include references which demonstrate this. PhilKnight (talk) 21:22, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
what does this means ?
You write:
- Use of the site for other purposes, such as advocacy or propaganda, furtherance of outside conflicts, publishing or promoting original research, and political or ideological struggle, is prohibited.' which is essentially similar.
Do you really think I am doing all this? If so, why? All I am trying to do is to write an article about Kendrick analysis. Kehrli (talk) 02:19, 2 March 2011 (UTC)