User talk:Toontown59153: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
:Critical reception section<br /> |
:Critical reception section<br /> |
||
:...and anything else you can think of as you're going along. Thanks! [[User:Toontown59153|Toontown59153]] ([[User talk:Toontown59153#top|talk]]) |
:...and anything else you can think of as you're going along. Thanks! [[User:Toontown59153|Toontown59153]] ([[User talk:Toontown59153#top|talk]]) 01:23, 16 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 01:23, 16 March 2011
Barnstars
Please don't place barnstars on my talk page. Please put them on my user page! Thank you!
New messages
Click here to be taken to new messages awaiting you. ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ ―Œ ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣ 18:32, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
You should try and find sources, at least 1 or 2 as to why this novel is notable for inclusion on Wikipedia, from reliable, 3rd party sources. CTJF83 21:27, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
It must meet at least one of the criteria at Wikipedia:Notability (books) and also WP:GNG CTJF83 21:36, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks you! I found a couple sources, are those okay? I was a little confused reading the notability page you linked there.
- Toontown59153 (talk) 22:37, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
- The source you provided only verifies the book is real. You would need at least 1, source saying why the book is notable. Like is there a review for the book in the New York Times or something similar? Take a look at the 2nd box at the top of Wikipedia:Notability (books). Are any of the numbers 1-5 true in the case of this book? I'm not seeing any yet. CTJF83 22:42, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
- Well I looked around the NY Times website and I found this. It's sort of a mini-review I guess. (The last one on the list.)
- Toontown59153 (talk) 23:15, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- It's a good start, but it doesn't meet significant coverage...just yet. CTJF83 12:14, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- The source you provided only verifies the book is real. You would need at least 1, source saying why the book is notable. Like is there a review for the book in the New York Times or something similar? Take a look at the 2nd box at the top of Wikipedia:Notability (books). Are any of the numbers 1-5 true in the case of this book? I'm not seeing any yet. CTJF83 22:42, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Woods Runner
Sure, I'd be happy to help with your article on Woods Runner. What would you like help with? I'm open to work with pretty much anything. BobAmnertiopsis∴ChatMe! 00:49, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks!!! I'll just make a huge list of all the things I am going to need to do...a few minutes later...
- Correct the infobox (including book cover when finished)
- Find more reliable references as we go along
- Inspiration and Origins section
- Plot Summary section
- Genre and themes section
- Critical reception section
- ...and anything else you can think of as you're going along. Thanks! Toontown59153 (talk) 01:23, 16 March 2011 (UTC)