Talk:PoweredUSB: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
: Can we call it a [[de facto standard]] ? --[[Special:Contributions/76.209.28.222|76.209.28.222]] ([[User talk:76.209.28.222|talk]]) 12:47, 10 February 2009 (UTC) |
: Can we call it a [[de facto standard]] ? --[[Special:Contributions/76.209.28.222|76.209.28.222]] ([[User talk:76.209.28.222|talk]]) 12:47, 10 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
::It is patented and belongs to someone, which would make it a [[proprietary standard]] except we have no such article because some consider it a [[contradiction in terms]]. [[Proprietary format]] would seem to apply unless someone wants to restrict that term to software. [[User:Jim.henderson|Jim.henderson]] ([[User talk:Jim.henderson|talk]]) 16:06, 10 February 2009 (UTC) |
::It is patented and belongs to someone, which would make it a [[proprietary standard]] except we have no such article because some consider it a [[contradiction in terms]]. [[Proprietary format]] would seem to apply unless someone wants to restrict that term to software. [[User:Jim.henderson|Jim.henderson]] ([[User talk:Jim.henderson|talk]]) 16:06, 10 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
:::It may be patented, and charged a license fee, but it is used by multiple manufacturers and is the dominant standard in a particular specialised application. I'd say it's a de facto standard.[[Special:Contributions/80.101.113.45|80.101.113.45]] ([[User talk:80.101.113.45|talk]]) 15:08, 24 March 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Logo/Icon idea == |
== Logo/Icon idea == |
Revision as of 15:08, 24 March 2011
![]() | Computing Unassessed | |||||||||
|
Non-standard
Since Powered USB is not ratified by any generally recognized standards setting body but is instead owned by IBM it is actually a non-standard proprietary implementation rather than a standard and so should not be called a "standard".
- Can we call it a de facto standard ? --76.209.28.222 (talk) 12:47, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- It is patented and belongs to someone, which would make it a proprietary standard except we have no such article because some consider it a contradiction in terms. Proprietary format would seem to apply unless someone wants to restrict that term to software. Jim.henderson (talk) 16:06, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- It may be patented, and charged a license fee, but it is used by multiple manufacturers and is the dominant standard in a particular specialised application. I'd say it's a de facto standard.80.101.113.45 (talk) 15:08, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- It is patented and belongs to someone, which would make it a proprietary standard except we have no such article because some consider it a contradiction in terms. Proprietary format would seem to apply unless someone wants to restrict that term to software. Jim.henderson (talk) 16:06, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Logo/Icon idea
Some icons are showing up with with the small USB symbol with a plus sign. Specifically one of the desktop machines we have purchased from DELL around 3 months ago. Could that be mentioned/included here? --134.84.164.49 (talk) 18:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Subj on Dell Latitude (D830) laptop?
subj? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.133.189.23 (talk) 04:08, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Sleep-and-charge
There are at least 4 modes associated with this. --Kvng (talk) 15:01, 25 August 2010 (UTC)