Jump to content

Talk:72 (number): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{NumberTalk}}
{{NumberTalk}}
{{WikiProject Kabbalah|class=Start}}
{{WikiProject Judaism|class=start|importance=low}}

nevermind [[User:72.66.249.231|72.66.249.231]] 15:13, 27 September 2007 (UTC)


== 72 is not a highly composite number ==
== 72 is not a highly composite number ==

Revision as of 04:07, 27 March 2011

WikiProject iconNumbers Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Numbers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Numbers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

72 is not a highly composite number

72 is not a highly composite number: See the article on highly composite number, which lists the first dozen highly composite numbers and 72 is not in this list.

Note that "highly composite number" is NOT some phrase to be used on a whim, but rather there is a technical definition of this concept. 98.67.171.23 (talk) 04:05, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]