Talk:72 (number)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Untitled[edit]

nevermind 72.66.249.231 15:13, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Wrong Field?[edit]

wouldn't the number of hours in three days be an astronomical example? I personally think so but i wanted to make sure before i put it in. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DerBarJude (talkcontribs) 16:30, 22 May 2010 (UTC)


GTA4[edit]

Someone mention the 24 spoof in GTA4 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.196.67.88 (talk) 18:50, 14 July 2008 (UTC)


There should be a mention of the DTP point here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.87.151.1 (talk) 15:22, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

72 is not a highly composite number[edit]

72 is not a highly composite number: See the article on highly composite number, which lists the first dozen highly composite numbers and 72 is not in this list.

Note that "highly composite number" is NOT some phrase to be used on a whim, but rather there is a technical definition of this concept. 98.67.171.23 (talk) 04:05, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Agreed. Also, it has 12 divisors, not 11. The smallest number with exactly 11 divisors is 1024. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 11:28, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

  • http://www.ngcic.org/
    • In IC 1337 on 2011-04-23 17:08:25, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In IC 1337 on 2011-04-24 04:34:10, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 10 (number) on 2011-05-23 02:06:58, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 10 (number) on 2011-05-31 22:27:07, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 11 (number) on 2011-06-01 02:53:15, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 138 (number) on 2011-06-01 14:55:19, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 48 (number) on 2011-06-19 14:01:14, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 52 (number) on 2011-06-19 20:05:38, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'

--JeffGBot (talk) 21:04, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 21:04, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 3[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 21:04, 19 June 2011 (UTC)