Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jvolkblum: Difference between revisions
HelloAnnyong (talk | contribs) Comment, marking case as closed |
reopening the case and adding two more users |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{SPIarchive notice|Jvolkblum}} |
{{SPIarchive notice|Jvolkblum}} |
||
{{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|Curequest}} |
||
=====<big>07 April 2011</big>===== |
=====<big>07 April 2011</big>===== |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Another sleeper check for banned Jvolkblum and his New Rochelle nonsense, please. Thank you. <span class="wknight94sig">[[User:Wknight94|Wknight94]] [[User talk:Wknight94|<sup>talk</sup>]]</span> 13:37, 7 April 2011 (UTC) |
Another sleeper check for banned Jvolkblum and his New Rochelle nonsense, please. Thank you. <span class="wknight94sig">[[User:Wknight94|Wknight94]] [[User talk:Wknight94|<sup>talk</sup>]]</span> 13:37, 7 April 2011 (UTC) |
||
Reopening to add two new suspected sockpuppets: |
|||
*{{checkuser|1=Stampedglass}} |
|||
*{{checkuser|1=MacNDee}} |
|||
I blocked both of these users. A new checkuser is requested to see who else is in the sock drawer. Note that there are several other recent socks in the archived case from 3 April 2011; they may be useful for comparison. --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 13:30, 9 April 2011 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== |
Revision as of 13:30, 9 April 2011
Jvolkblum
- Jvolkblum (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
07 April 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Fadalissimo (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Carolann89 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Another sleeper check for banned Jvolkblum and his New Rochelle nonsense, please. Thank you. Wknight94 talk 13:37, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Reopening to add two new suspected sockpuppets:
- Stampedglass (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- MacNDee (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
I blocked both of these users. A new checkuser is requested to see who else is in the sock drawer. Note that there are several other recent socks in the archived case from 3 April 2011; they may be useful for comparison. --Orlady (talk) 13:30, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Two groups here, whose edits seem to tie them together:
- Confirmed these two match each other:
- Steeler199 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Fadalissimo (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Group 2 (these two match each other as well):
- Carolann89 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Kingsizedirect (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) TNXMan 15:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- Administrator note All accounts have been blocked, and the IPs as well. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 03:05, 8 April 2011 (UTC)