User talk:Msnicki

Thanks

For the record here, I felt that your part of the conversation with me at the 2N3055 AfD stayed within the bounds of civility, to a tolerance I have no trouble accepting. I obviously can't speak for others who took part there, but I sensed a willingness on your part to engage in good-faith discussion. __ Just plain Bill (talk) 18:59, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much, Bill. I enjoy debate, I always learn a lot and I like and believe in the consensus model, even if I'm sometimes on the losing side. I'm always sad when we move away from the issues to the people involved. I thought you were totally okay, too. Thank you for reaching out. Kind regards, Msnicki (talk) 19:19, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Once or twice before, I've found myself deep in the truth versus verifiability business. I like to think that, most days, Wikipedia benefits from some corollary of Linus' Law. Be well, __ Just plain Bill (talk) 20:06, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

Dabomb87 (talk) 16:52, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I enjoy contributing here and would enjoy helping in this way, too. Again, thank you. Msnicki (talk) 17:01, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Fastsigns page

Msnicki,

I was just reviewing the deletion review and was looking over your comments about an article I tried posting for Fastsigns. You seem to think that the article should be posted, and that it meets notability requirements. That is great - what is the next step to get this live? Should I just repost is? It seems like I have addressed all the typography issues, provided references, etc... Is there any way you can recommend to an admin that it be posted? I just want to get this thing live and I am starting to get extremely confused. Thanks!

Kilgoretrout89 (talk) 17:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)