Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Frank (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Listing on WP:DELSORT under People |
Strangerer (talk | contribs) →Lisa Frank: Weak keep |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Visual arts|list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:18, 17 April 2011 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Visual arts|list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:18, 17 April 2011 (UTC)</small> |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:19, 17 April 2011 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:19, 17 April 2011 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Weak keep''' If this was an article about Lisa Frank Incorporated, it would be a '''strong keep'''. What about moving the info to a page about the company itself? That could be a strong article. With Arxiloxos's rollback, the references are already there to support it, and really all we'd lose is the note about where she went to school. --[[User:Strangerer|Strangerer]] <small>([[User_talk:Strangerer|Talk]])</small> 20:47, 18 April 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:47, 18 April 2011
AfDs for this article:
- Lisa Frank (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This page is an unsourced BLP, tagged since 2009. It doesn't have any third party references, and the only external link is an official website about the subject. Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) T/S 05:13, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. It's often helpful to check an article's history when considering whether to nominate it for AfD. In this case, the history reveals that the article was the victim of serial vandalism followed by incomplete efforts to fix the vandalism. All of this left it without the sources that were supplied during the first AfD, which closed with a keep result on 22 August 2010. I've now restored the article to its condition at that time, which includes sourcing. I continue to agree with Cindamuse's keep rationale at the first AfD.--Arxiloxos (talk) 06:17, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
- Keep She was very visible a few years ago. I'm surprised there are not more sources available. But still there is enough provided to keep the article. Kitfoxxe (talk) 07:43, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
- Weak keep If this was an article about Lisa Frank Incorporated, it would be a strong keep. What about moving the info to a page about the company itself? That could be a strong article. With Arxiloxos's rollback, the references are already there to support it, and really all we'd lose is the note about where she went to school. --Strangerer (Talk) 20:47, 18 April 2011 (UTC)