User talk:Magu2k: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:40, 13 May 2011

Stuff goes here

Graphics re WT:CWNB

If you want a grunty task that is cross-border (though Canada is where all the water comes from), here's one from my "will never get around to" list: in the featured article Columbia River#Irrigation is a map showing the major dams in the Columbia watershed. It's original purpose was in a different article I believe, where the location of every dam was shown. This map (IMO) needs a forked version for the Columbia River article, with all the axtra dots removed so that only the numbered dams are shown. All this will do is declutter and simplify the map, so it's not a huge issue - but it is a FA, so might be worth the effort. I discussed this with Mr. Map (User:Kmusser) long ago and I have a parent version in .ai format to work from if you ping me an email. I only know a tiny bit of Photoshop, I think I'd try the heal tool and the sample thingie. Franamax (talk) 20:46, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds tough.. not sure if I could do it but I am definitely interested in giving it a try, what is your email address? Magu (talk) 21:40, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 20:46, 13 May 2011 edit Franamax (talk \| contribs) 18,113 edits →‎Graphics re WT:CWNB: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:40, 13 May 2011 edit undo Magu2k (talk \| contribs) 325 edits →‎Graphics re WT:CWNB Next edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:

	If you want a grunty task that is cross-border (though Canada is where all the water comes from), here's one from my "will never get around to" list: in the featured article [[Columbia River#Irrigation]] is a map showing the major dams in the Columbia watershed. It's original purpose was in a different article I believe, where the location of ''every'' dam was shown. This map (IMO) needs a forked version for the Columbia River article, with all the axtra dots removed so that only the numbered dams are shown. All this will do is declutter and simplify the map, so it's not a huge issue - but it is a FA, so might be worth the effort. I discussed this with Mr. Map ([[User:Kmusser]]) long ago and I have a parent version in .ai format to work from if you ping me an email. I only know a tiny bit of Photoshop, I think I'd try the heal tool and the sample thingie. [[User:Franamax\|Franamax]] ([[User talk:Franamax\|talk]]) 20:46, 13 May 2011 (UTC)		If you want a grunty task that is cross-border (though Canada is where all the water comes from), here's one from my "will never get around to" list: in the featured article [[Columbia River#Irrigation]] is a map showing the major dams in the Columbia watershed. It's original purpose was in a different article I believe, where the location of ''every'' dam was shown. This map (IMO) needs a forked version for the Columbia River article, with all the axtra dots removed so that only the numbered dams are shown. All this will do is declutter and simplify the map, so it's not a huge issue - but it is a FA, so might be worth the effort. I discussed this with Mr. Map ([[User:Kmusser]]) long ago and I have a parent version in .ai format to work from if you ping me an email. I only know a tiny bit of Photoshop, I think I'd try the heal tool and the sample thingie. [[User:Franamax\|Franamax]] ([[User talk:Franamax\|talk]]) 20:46, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

			:: Sounds tough.. not sure if I could do it but I am definitely interested in giving it a try, what is your email address? [[User:Magu2k\|Magu]] ([[User talk:Magu2k#top\|talk]]) 21:40, 13 May 2011 (UTC)