User talk:Hrafn

New threads belong at the bottom of talk pages (pressing the 'new section' link at the top, or here, will do this automatically for you). I reserve the right to summarily remove (without responding, and possibly even without reading) any new threads placed here at the top of this talk page. Discussion directly pertaining to a specific article belongs on that article's talkpage. Where such discussion is erroneously posted here, I may move it to article talk, or (if I'm feeling lazy, crabby, or for any other arbitrary reason) simply delete or revert it -- so best to post it where it belongs in the first place. I likewise reserve the right to curtail (by reversion, deletion, archiving or otherwise) any thread on this talkpage that I (on my sole discretion) feel has become, or is is likely to be, unproductive. If you object to such curtailment, then by all means don't post here. Talkback: This user has their preferences set to automatically watchlist all articles they edit, and all pages they comment upon. It is therefore completely unnecessary for you to {{talkback}} this user to tell them that you have replied to a comment. Further, there is nothing in that template's description suggests it should be used for XfDs or article talk -- so using it for such pages is inappropriate. I would (fürther fürther) note that I am under no obligation to respond to each and every comment you make (and there will be times that purposefully avoiding responding would appear to be the most politic course of action). Finally (fürther fürther fürther), if you keep doing it, I'll probably eventually have to find some more coercive way of convincing you to follow good WP:Wikiquette and stop. Ω. (Don't trip over the møøse on the way out.)

SDA

I happened to notice something a little bit odd. There is a long section in Southern Adventist University on a scandal in the 1980s which resulted in the resignation of the president. The material is based on cherry-picked portions of this source. [1] Similar and simultaNeous events at Pacific Union College are not mentioned in that article, even though the material is available in exactly the same source. [2] BelloWello edited both articles, including negative material for SAU and peacock statements in the lede for PUC. I don't edit in this area, but that does not seem quite right. Mathsci (talk) 12:46, 17 May 2011 (UTC)