Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 June 30

30 June 2011

User:Kygora/Falling In Reverse

User:Kygora/Falling In Reverse (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore)

This is my personal page that i was working on until the band met the requirements of WP:BAND so that when they did meet the requirements i would not have to create and entirely new page and just move my Personal page to the mainsapce. Please restore it Immediately. --Kygora 16:14, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

• Comment: For background, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Falling In Reverse, Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 June 13#Falling In Reverse and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Ronnie Radke pages. Cunard (talk) 19:53, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
• Question-Is there any reason to believe that this band would mean WP:BAND now, or just at some unspecified future time?--Fyre2387 ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:13, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

• This band will Meet what is need for WP:BAND in the near Future. They are Signed to a Major Record label.--Kygora 07:42, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

• Question How (if at all) is any of this related to User:Vision07/Falling in reverse? DMacks (talk) 00:31, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

• it is not related to that, that one was one that i moved to that persons Userspace because they tried putting it on the Mainspace when it is currently not allowed. also, it is terribly cited and a complete and terrible version compared to my amazing cited and well done version(which came first) --Kygora 07:42, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

• qualified restore- Unless I'm missing something, I'm just not seeing a reason why a userspace draft wouldn't be allowable for this band. in the DRV listed above, Tarc makes the case that while they don't meet any notability criteria now, there's a reasonable chance that they will in the not-so-distant future. I do add that my restore is qualified in the event that there's something I'm missing. Umbralcorax (talk) 01:31, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
• The whole discussion here is the wrong way around. We aren't the userspace police. It's not for Kygora to explain why his userspace article is justified. It's for Jayjg to explain why it was necessary to delete it.—S Marshall T/C 10:26, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
• I'm assuming the G4 is a follow on to the MfD which deleted a user-space draft of the same name. I think that means the deleting admin followed the rules correctly. I'm not overly fond of the underlying MfD though (it's really not clear WP:FAKEARTICLE applies here if the band is likely to be notable shortly, and if Tarc thinks it might be, I'll tend to believe it). I'd suggest the content be restored as an IAR thing, but unless I'm missing something there was nothing technically wrong with the G4. Hobit (talk) 17:53, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Sherman3D

Sherman3D (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore)

The page is deleted and protected after I quoted from the Sherman3D company's page probably because of some previous spam posted by some other user. I tried to tell http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PMDrive1061 that I will fix the quoted parts but he retired. I got Sherman3D and a few other RPG Maker companies to give me the license to write about their companies and games and I did extensive research with multiple references. Please move http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alphakimori/Sherman3D to Sherman3D if you think it is well written and does not infringe any copyright - I have rewritten all quotes in my own words. Sorry for the inconvenience as it was one of my first articles. I am just a big fan of RPG Maker games and I think these companies and games deserve to be on Wikipedia considering how prominent they are among the RPG gaming community. Thank you! Alphakimori (talk) 20:04, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

• Please let me know if I have made a mistake in posting this because I have moved this from the 25th of June to this section as I haven't gotten any response. Would a passing admin please move http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alphakimori/Sherman3D to Sherman3D or unprotect Sherman3D please? Thank you. Alphakimori (talk) 22:54, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
• Comment – if the article is to be restored and userfied, then only the versions from 2008 and before can be restored, as both deleted edits from the recreation in 2011 were deleted as a copyvio. –MuZemike 17:53, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
• Thank you for your kind attention to this matter, MuZemike. As I was trying to tell PMDrive1061 before he retired, I have since re-written the article so there should be no copyright issue. It is now available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alphakimori/Sherman3D Please allow me to move it to Sherman3D or move it for me as the page has been protected from modification. Thank you. Alphakimori (talk) 18:54, 1 July 2011 (UTC)