User talk:GordonD

June 2011

Hello GordonD. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Huyton Hill Preparatory School, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 22:46, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello Elizium 23, I was a pupil at the school in the mid 1960's and wish to preserve a little of it's history and the fact that it did exist. I have had no affiliation with any organisation or owner of the building or site since it closed in 1971.

Would you review my article and make any comments, I have made it factual. Thank you. GordonD (talk) 23:53, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

I think that given those two factors, your actual conflict of interest is close to nil. I have retracted the notice. The article looks alright for starters. I have one edit in mind, I will make it and let you continue if you have more improvements to make. Elizium23 (talk) 01:58, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your fast reply and the edits. Can you Accept the article and I will continue to add to it as I obtain new information. I am in the process of checking copyright on an aerial postcard photo of the school from 1960 and I intend to add that to the article. Thanks. GordonD (talk) 20:08, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

I thought my article Huyton Hill Preparatory School could be moved after review by Elizium23, but the notice about needing review remained, so I have moved it back. GordonD (talk) 20:10, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

== Your submission at Articles for creation ==

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Huyton Hill Preparatory School. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! avs5221^(t|c) 12:20, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing my article. The school is of interest to social historians who may want to research schools that were evacuated from main cities in England at the outbreak of World War II. It is notable for its progressive approach to discipline which will be of interest to educational and social historians. It also has the claim of being the first school in England to host an aircraft landing field. Since many other schools also have pages in Wikipedia I thought that this was an appropriate and interesting addition. I hope you will reconsider allowing the article to be published.GordonD (talk) 20:18, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

All of these things are very interesting, and it really pains me to say this because you clearly enjoy writing about the school. But, that said, my problem with the article is two-fold. One, of course, is the lack of sources. This leads into my second point of contention. While all of these stories about the school make for a very charming article, they do not lend themselves to an encyclopedic article. For instance, I don't imagine you'll be able to find secondary sources referencing the school's punishment system. While it's an interesting read, it's not very important in the grand scheme of things. Likewise, wartime airfields are a well documented occurrence in England, but you may have trouble writing a thorough enough article about the school's own airfield to justify an entire article. Perhaps a small subsection in another article would be appropriate?

Of course, this is all contingent upon your ability to research and document reliable secondary sources. If you find a handful of sources that attest to the importance of this school, its airfield and punishment structure, etc., then please include them in the article. Otherwise, I stand by my previous assessment. Nonetheless, thank you for your continuing enthusiasm and receptiveness to criticism.

avs5221^(t|c) 23:44, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Huyton Hill Preparatory School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

• The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
• Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 07:16, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi Logan, thanks for your review and assessment. GordonD (talk) 18:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)