Jump to content

User talk:Island Monkey: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tnxman307 (talk | contribs)
→‎Excuse me...: declining
Island Monkey (talk | contribs)
Line 58: Line 58:


{{unblock reviewed | 1=I'm not a sock of that evil person. Many people on here edit war. You CU'd me right? Without notification? Canvassing. Fishing. CheckUser isn't a magic wand, you know. If you didn't CU me, any evidence? Island Monkey talk the talk 3:15 am, Today (UTC−4) | decline=Any other catchphrases you'd like to mention? Checkuser verified sock- please contact the Arbitration Committee to request unblocking. <font color="darkorange">[[User:Tnxman307|TN]]</font><b><font color="midnightblue"><big>[[User talk:Tnxman307|X]]</big></font></b><font color="red">[[Special:Contributions/Tnxman307|Man]]</font> 13:14, 13 July 2011 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed | 1=I'm not a sock of that evil person. Many people on here edit war. You CU'd me right? Without notification? Canvassing. Fishing. CheckUser isn't a magic wand, you know. If you didn't CU me, any evidence? Island Monkey talk the talk 3:15 am, Today (UTC−4) | decline=Any other catchphrases you'd like to mention? Checkuser verified sock- please contact the Arbitration Committee to request unblocking. <font color="darkorange">[[User:Tnxman307|TN]]</font><b><font color="midnightblue"><big>[[User talk:Tnxman307|X]]</big></font></b><font color="red">[[Special:Contributions/Tnxman307|Man]]</font> 13:14, 13 July 2011 (UTC)}}
:How has ArbCom got to do with this? I have had no trouble with ArbCom. [[User:Island Monkey|Island Monkey]] <sup>[[User talk:Island Monkey|talk the talk]]</sup> 14:33, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:33, 13 July 2011

If you wish to give me a barnstar (or any award as such) please, I beg you, don't use that horrible WikiLove thing.

Archives: /Archive 1, /Archive 2, /Archive 3, /Archive 4.

Leave me a message.

Re: You seem an experienced user...

While I appreciate the idea, I must respectfully decline. I have no ambitions of adminship, nor do I fancy the idea of subjecting myself to interrogation. Thanks anyways. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:44, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Edit warring.

Hello, Island Monkey. You have new messages at FleetCommand's talk page.
Message added 15:52, 8 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Edit warring warning

An edit warring warning for the very, very FIRST revert in 15 hours, while the other editor, who is at his second revert in 10 minutes does not get a warning. You must be kidding. --Dirk Beetstra T C 15:42, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Get away from me! I don't want your copyrightparanoiaitis!!! Island Monkey talk the talk 15:46, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know how serious you're being (obviously "copyrightparanoiaitis" is meant to be at least partly humourous) but I hope you realise that no-one thinks for a moment that there is any legal concern about either of the contested versions of the article. CIreland (talk) 15:52, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at List of Rozen Maiden characters. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. 28bytes (talk) 16:50, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, shouldn't Delta be blocked as well? Island Monkey talk the talk 16:51, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  1. No, because he's doing NFCC enforcement, and
  2. See WP:NOTTHEM. 28bytes (talk) 16:59, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Well, I'm sorry, but, he is still in motion for a block since WP:3RRNO clearly states that only unquestionable NFCC violations are exempt from 3RR. His removal of the images has been questioned, see the talk page. Island Monkey talk the talk 17:04, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well then, you will be happy to note that he has been blocked by another admin. 28bytes (talk) 17:05, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Then I now accept this block, it is good to know. See you tomorrow. Island Monkey talk the talk 17:07, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fast Lane (song)

The article Fast Lane (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . This article has numerous issues, but I will give you the general seven days to fix these issues. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Fast_Lane_(song)/GA1 for things which need to be addressed. - Rp0211 (talk2me) 19:20, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adding to Rp, Monkey, I have so far done most of the fixes but would you care to make sure they were done right? Please take your time, with the July 18 deadline in mind. Thanks! WIKIPEDIAN PENGUIN (♫♫) 23:41, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Since all of the issues have been addressed, I put the article in good article status. For comments see: Talk:Fast_Lane_(song)/GA1. Congratulations and keep up the good work. - Rp0211 (talk2me) 02:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I was gonna ask WPP in the morning (well, morning for Britain), but it appears it's been done over the BST moonlight. Island Monkey talk the talk 07:10, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. –MuZemike 21:04, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

As a clearly evident block-evading sock puppet of Special Cases (talk · contribs). –MuZemike 21:04, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nuspire-networks.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nuspire-networks.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:16, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me...

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Island Monkey (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm not a sock of that evil person. Many people on here edit war. You CU'd me right? Without notification? Canvassing. Fishing. CheckUser isn't a magic wand, you know. If you didn't CU me, any evidence? Island Monkey talk the talk 3:15 am, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

Any other catchphrases you'd like to mention? Checkuser verified sock- please contact the Arbitration Committee to request unblocking. TNXMan 13:14, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How has ArbCom got to do with this? I have had no trouble with ArbCom. Island Monkey talk the talk 14:33, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]