Talk:Book (magazine): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
tag using AWB |
add tags; add note re: copyedit |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Magazines}} |
{{WikiProject Magazines}} |
||
{{GOCE|user=Macwhiz|date=July 18, 2011}} |
|||
{{Connected contributor|JVKramer|Book Magazine|editedhere=yes|declared=no}} |
|||
==July 2011 Copyedit== |
|||
I've completed a copyedit of the article. It turned into something of a rewrite because of the [[WP:NPOV]] issues present. I have noted a potential [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] with a template above; {{User|JVKramer}} appears likely to be Jerome Kramer, founder and editor-in-chief of ''Book''. I removed two sections from the article because they appeared to be [[WP:TRIVIA]] lists and were not cited: a list of the magazine's editorial staff, and a list of people featured on issue covers. Neither appeared to be acceptable per [[WP:NOT]]. I have removed the COI tag from the article, because I believe it now presents a neutral view of the topic. // [[User:Macwhiz|⌘macwhiz]] ([[User talk:Macwhiz|talk]]) 02:49, 19 July 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:49, 19 July 2011
Magazines Unassessed | |||||||||||||
|
Guild of Copy Editors | ||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
July 2011 Copyedit
I've completed a copyedit of the article. It turned into something of a rewrite because of the WP:NPOV issues present. I have noted a potential conflict of interest with a template above; JVKramer (talk · contribs) appears likely to be Jerome Kramer, founder and editor-in-chief of Book. I removed two sections from the article because they appeared to be WP:TRIVIA lists and were not cited: a list of the magazine's editorial staff, and a list of people featured on issue covers. Neither appeared to be acceptable per WP:NOT. I have removed the COI tag from the article, because I believe it now presents a neutral view of the topic. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 02:49, 19 July 2011 (UTC)