User talk:2.138.219.49: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Wifione (talk | contribs)
dec
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
:That's quite an appallingly rude "review". How dare you "suggest" that I stop editing? How dare you suggest that I switched IPs deliberately? I am away from home - how exactly would I use the IP associated with my home internet connection?
:That's quite an appallingly rude "review". How dare you "suggest" that I stop editing? How dare you suggest that I switched IPs deliberately? I am away from home - how exactly would I use the IP associated with my home internet connection?
{{unblock reviewed | 1=No block was evaded | decline=Come back after a week and thank the editors then. It'll allow you time to cool down your angst too.[[User:Wifione|'''<span style="color: red; 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em"> Wifione </span>''']] [[User talk:Wifione|'''<sub style="font-size: 60%">.......</sub><sup style="margin-left:-3ex"> Leave a message</sup>''']] 17:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed | 1=No block was evaded | decline=Come back after a week and thank the editors then. It'll allow you time to cool down your angst too.[[User:Wifione|'''<span style="color: red; 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em"> Wifione </span>''']] [[User talk:Wifione|'''<sub style="font-size: 60%">.......</sub><sup style="margin-left:-3ex"> Leave a message</sup>''']] 17:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)}}
{{unblock|Look, it's not a hard point. This IP was blocked for "block evasion". No block was evaded. Ergo, the block should not have been made.}}

Revision as of 17:27, 27 July 2011

Christ, what a fucking joke. I happen to be in Spain, where previously I was in the UK. So how am I supposed to edit from the same IP as normal? Did I edit any other pages except the talk page of that IP? No I didn't. Why block this IP without even thinking to ask a polite question or two? Because you are deeply, deeply prejudiced against anonymous editors, that's why. Seriously, you think I deserved all this shit just for changing "explained" to "said"?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2.138.219.49 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

No block was evaded. The block applied to this IP was just part of a general pile-on by editors who failed to assume good faith, enthusiastically bit the newbie, and generally did their best to hound out someone who was merely making constructive edits. They did well - I doubt very much whether I'll bother to contribute any more. But I resent this further slap in the face deeply enough that I insist on being unblocked, so that at the very least I can thank on their talk pages those few editors who did not join the herd which attacked me so unnecessarily.

Decline reason:

This IP is blocked or, more specifically, the person behind the IP is blocked. You do not get to switch IPs and make edits as if nothing had happened. I would also suggest reading WP:NOTTHEM. If you're serious about not editing any longer, then I suggest starting now. TNXMan 16:12, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That's quite an appallingly rude "review". How dare you "suggest" that I stop editing? How dare you suggest that I switched IPs deliberately? I am away from home - how exactly would I use the IP associated with my home internet connection?
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2.138.219.49 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

No block was evaded

Decline reason:

Come back after a week and thank the editors then. It'll allow you time to cool down your angst too. Wifione ....... Leave a message 17:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

2.138.219.49 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Look, it's not a hard point. This IP was blocked for "block evasion". No block was evaded. Ergo, the block should not have been made.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Look, it's not a hard point. This IP was blocked for "block evasion". No block was evaded. Ergo, the block should not have been made. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Look, it's not a hard point. This IP was blocked for "block evasion". No block was evaded. Ergo, the block should not have been made. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Look, it's not a hard point. This IP was blocked for "block evasion". No block was evaded. Ergo, the block should not have been made. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}