Talk:Rhapsody (operating system): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:56, 18 August 2011

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rhapsody (operating system) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Apple Inc. Start‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Red Box

Is it work mentioning the Red Box rumour? (It was a rumoured box that had a certain level of compatability with Windows. There's some speculation it may be dusted off and brought into MacOS X)

It was a rummor... There are no screen shots and little plans to make it although yellow box could be worth mentioning.

It was a widely believed rummor - although no product was made. Although it was a widely succesful rummer and should be mentionted as it generated a great deal of interest in rhapsody.--Frozenport (talk) 05:27, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article moved

I'm not exactly crazy about this move solely for the sake of consistency, but if it's going to be "Apple Rhapsody," can we at least get rid of the "(operating system)" now?MFNickster 22:08, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd prefer to get rid of the "Apple" myself. Was there a discussion on this that I missed? Maury 16:06, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. User:Rwwww boldly moved the article where it had never been moved before. MFNickster 18:13, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, well any objections to moving it to "Rhapsody (operating system)"? This is the style for all of the related-content articles, and it reads better too (IMHO). Maury 21:38, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No objections reported, moving... Maury 13:21, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moved, most inbound links moved to avoid redirs though (OS). Notify me if you find any dangling ones! Maury 13:34, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Roger that. MFNickster 13:54, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The latest stable version info in the infobox is broken. The version number is coming from the Rhapsody music service, and not the values given for Rhapsody OS. Lavenderbunny (talk) 21:15, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures

All of the pictures, or a reduced-resolution copy of them, would clearly have been fair use. WHAT IS WITH THE MASS DELETION OF EVERY PICTURE ON WIKIPEDIA? The destruction of content is a mortal sin; this one doubly so. FAIR USE! -128.61.83.190 (talk) 14:56, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 The latest stable version info in the infobox is broken. The version number is coming from the Rhapsody music service, and not the values given for Rhapsody OS. [[User:Lavenderbunny|Lavenderbunny]] ([[User talk:Lavenderbunny|talk]]) 21:15, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
+== Pictures ==
+All of the pictures, or a reduced-resolution copy of them, would clearly have been fair use.  WHAT IS WITH THE MASS DELETION OF EVERY PICTURE ON WIKIPEDIA?  The destruction of content is a mortal sin; this one doubly so.  FAIR USE!
+-[[Special:Contributions/128.61.83.190|128.61.83.190]] ([[User talk:128.61.83.190|talk]]) 14:56, 18 August 2011 (UTC)