User talk:Essjay: Difference between revisions
Flcelloguy (talk | contribs) →Quote for the ''Signpost'': Comment |
CheckUser Assistance |
||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
::P.S. Congrats, Essjay! You're one of the most trustworthy people out there! [[User:Flcelloguy|Flcelloguy]] <small>([[User talk:Flcelloguy|A <font color="brown">note?</font>]])</small> 03:17, 20 March 2006 (UTC) |
::P.S. Congrats, Essjay! You're one of the most trustworthy people out there! [[User:Flcelloguy|Flcelloguy]] <small>([[User talk:Flcelloguy|A <font color="brown">note?</font>]])</small> 03:17, 20 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
== CheckUser Assistance == |
|||
==CheckUser Assistance== |
|||
Hello, I feel I need some assistance. A user placed my userid in for a CheckUser here [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_CheckUser#PoolGuy_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs.29_and_GoldToeMarionette_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs.29]]. I am not a very advanced user of Wikipedia, however after reading the green box at the top of [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_CheckUser]] there appears to be no reason for [[User:Jayjg]] to complete the investigation. |
|||
I am not sure if I have any Wikipedia Rights, however I feel as if they have been violated. I could understand if I had been acting to violate Wikipedia Policy, however I have not been, contrary to whatever the user who filed for the CheckUser wrote. |
|||
I would appreciate it if you would review this and comment back to me. Thank you. [[User:GoldToeMarionette|GoldToeMarionette]] 04:04, 20 March 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:04, 20 March 2006
User:Essjay/Header
User talk:Essjay/Top
User:Essjay/Directory
Umm....
Care to explain [1]? Damn.... I hope everything's ok. Not to be too intrusive, but I hope it's nothing serious. -Mysekurity 03:48, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
- No, I've just decided to move on. Essjay Talk • Contact 17:59, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, ok. Just as long as everything;s alright. The green e kinda looses its significance without Red. -Mysekurity 20:07, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
IRC Cloak
Not sure if this is the right place to put this, but I'm Werdna/Werdna648 on Freenode and I'd like a Wikipedia/* cloak. Werdna648T/C\@ 23:32, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
- Please put your request on WP:ICV (so there will be a record of it if there is ever a reason to ask) and then message me on IRC; I have to talk to you on IRC before I can have a cloak set (freenode rule). Essjay Talk • Contact 15:50, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Mediation:
Hi! When I logged on a few days ago, I saw that mediation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/Flashplayer/UGOPlayer_Encyclopedic had been cancelled. I understand that it was due to inactivity of this account. I understand this. However, I just wished to let you know and understand that my account is usually inactive, I tend to edit under IPs. If you wish to reopen the case, it'd be appreciated, but if not, then we'll try to resolve the issue through discussion again, and then probably arbitration. Sbloemeke 18:55, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Congrats
Re: [2] - I'm told you have already been informed of our decision, but congradulations nonetheless. Raul654 19:48, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, JamesF slipped in IRC. :-D Thank you, anyhow! (Oh, and *makes Boy Scout sign* I promise to do my duty...") Essjay Talk • Contact 19:52, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Ooh congratulations! Next stop GodKing? :-) the wub "?!" 22:57, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Congrats on your new checkuserness :D --lightdarkness (talk) 23:43, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you both very much! :-) Essjay Talk • Contact 02:24, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
I think it must be the "underlying IP", although the page that came up (when it said I was blocked) didn't appear to be my IP (which, if I remember correctly, is 24.58.164.194). Anyway, thanks for offering to help, I'll put the template on if it happens again, thanks for checking into it for me. :)--ViolinGirl♪ 21:59, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- No problem. Essjay Talk • Contact 22:29, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Thank you Arbcom
I wanted to wish you good luck with your new responsibility, use it well, use it wisely, and USE IT OFTEN. We need more active editors with check user rights, and honestly I cant think of a better person than yourself. Mike (T C) 01:25, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, I appreciate it. I've only done one so far, but I'm sure that is only the beginning of a very friendly relationship with it. :-) Essjay Talk • Contact 02:24, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Quote for the Signpost
Mind giving me a flashy sounding quote or two for tomorrow's issue? Just basically whether you had been thinking about this for a while, when ArbCom contacted you about this, etc. Thanks. Ral315 (talk) 02:22, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Sure. Do you want to "interview" me in IRC, or should I post it here? Essjay Talk • Contact 02:24, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- (To Ral315) (cc to Essjay, Ambi) Oops, I'd already mentioned the CheckUsers in News and Notes. Feel free to remove it and write a longer piece, or incorporate anything you have into it. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 03:17, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- P.S. Congrats, Essjay! You're one of the most trustworthy people out there! Flcelloguy (A note?) 03:17, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
CheckUser Assistance
CheckUser Assistance
Hello, I feel I need some assistance. A user placed my userid in for a CheckUser here Wikipedia:Requests_for_CheckUser#PoolGuy_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs.29_and_GoldToeMarionette_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs.29. I am not a very advanced user of Wikipedia, however after reading the green box at the top of Wikipedia:Requests_for_CheckUser there appears to be no reason for User:Jayjg to complete the investigation.
I am not sure if I have any Wikipedia Rights, however I feel as if they have been violated. I could understand if I had been acting to violate Wikipedia Policy, however I have not been, contrary to whatever the user who filed for the CheckUser wrote.
I would appreciate it if you would review this and comment back to me. Thank you. GoldToeMarionette 04:04, 20 March 2006 (UTC)