User talk:4: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Excavated dodecahedron? |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Hi 4, curious how you generated the [[Excavated dodecahedron]] as a polyhedron. I see you used Stella, and seems to be defined as a polyhedron rather than a stellation. This means stella should also be able to draw the dual, which I'm curious about. [[User:SockPuppetForTomruen|SockPuppetForTomruen]] ([[User talk:SockPuppetForTomruen|talk]]) 01:02, 2 September 2011 (UTC) |
Hi 4, curious how you generated the [[Excavated dodecahedron]] as a polyhedron. I see you used Stella, and seems to be defined as a polyhedron rather than a stellation. This means stella should also be able to draw the dual, which I'm curious about. [[User:SockPuppetForTomruen|SockPuppetForTomruen]] ([[User talk:SockPuppetForTomruen|talk]]) 01:02, 2 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
:try faceting the dodecahedron. [[User:4|4]] <small>[[User talk:4|T]] [[Special:Contributions/4|C]]</small> 07:57, 2 September 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:57, 2 September 2011
Template:Still not retired after all it seems ;-)
Enumeration of Regular Polyhedra
Hi, Please see My comments on the Regular polyhedron discussion page. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 18:16, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Excavated dodecahedron?
Hi 4, curious how you generated the Excavated dodecahedron as a polyhedron. I see you used Stella, and seems to be defined as a polyhedron rather than a stellation. This means stella should also be able to draw the dual, which I'm curious about. SockPuppetForTomruen (talk) 01:02, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
- try faceting the dodecahedron. 4 T C 07:57, 2 September 2011 (UTC)