User talk:71.208.35.206: Difference between revisions
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
If you have counterpoints to what I've stated very factually, you're invited to present them. The fact of the matter is that the Greater Denver area was and is contaminated by plutonium, and you, sir, are doing a great disservice to the Wikipedia readership by outright deleting this highly cited section. Expect an appropriate appeal to higher authority. --[[Special:Contributions/71.208.35.206|71.208.35.206]] ([[User talk:71.208.35.206#top|talk]]) 21:30, 3 September 2011 (UTC) |
If you have counterpoints to what I've stated very factually, you're invited to present them. The fact of the matter is that the Greater Denver area was and is contaminated by plutonium, and you, sir, are doing a great disservice to the Wikipedia readership by outright deleting this highly cited section. Expect an appropriate appeal to higher authority. --[[Special:Contributions/71.208.35.206|71.208.35.206]] ([[User talk:71.208.35.206#top|talk]]) 21:30, 3 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
Merely for the record and to comply with specific dispute resolution guidelines, this is a formal notice that I have initiated a dispute resolution for the unilateral actions by Orlady which completely deleted the Denver/Radioactive contamination sub-article without discussion; refer to the Dispute resolution noticeboard. --[[User:FormerNukeSubmariner|FormerNukeSubmariner]] ([[User talk:FormerNukeSubmariner|talk]]) 22:05, 3 September 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:05, 3 September 2011
September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to The Outsiders (novel) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Boccobrock•T 21:53, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Denver
Hello. Your edits to Denver appear to be expressing some opinions regarding radioactivity and Rocky Flats. Those edits have been reverted. Please note that one of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe this important core policy. --Orlady (talk) 21:15, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
As I'm sure you're aware, all of my posts have appropriate citations and are based in fact...particularly the effect of Rocky Flats on Denver, which is the focus of my edits (again, Denver). The citations include maps of plutonium contamination levels in Denver, all done by competent authority. It won't take much of an external review for the truth here to be revealed, which is that you are the one pushing a point of view.
If you have counterpoints to what I've stated very factually, you're invited to present them. The fact of the matter is that the Greater Denver area was and is contaminated by plutonium, and you, sir, are doing a great disservice to the Wikipedia readership by outright deleting this highly cited section. Expect an appropriate appeal to higher authority. --71.208.35.206 (talk) 21:30, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Merely for the record and to comply with specific dispute resolution guidelines, this is a formal notice that I have initiated a dispute resolution for the unilateral actions by Orlady which completely deleted the Denver/Radioactive contamination sub-article without discussion; refer to the Dispute resolution noticeboard. --FormerNukeSubmariner (talk) 22:05, 3 September 2011 (UTC)