User talk:Red Rover112: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Mnidaydwisww (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Red Rover112 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:Me too. ~'''[[User:Red Rover112|<span style="color:red;">Red Rover</span>]]''' <small>([[User talk:Red Rover112|Talk to me!]])</small> <small>[[Special:Contributions/Red Rover112|contribs]]</small> 03:24, 18 September 2011 (UTC) |
:Me too. ~'''[[User:Red Rover112|<span style="color:red;">Red Rover</span>]]''' <small>([[User talk:Red Rover112|Talk to me!]])</small> <small>[[Special:Contributions/Red Rover112|contribs]]</small> 03:24, 18 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
::No sorry. You to eat calv. {{User:Mnidaydwisww/sig}} 03:53, 18 September 2011 (UTC) |
::No sorry. You to eat calv. {{User:Mnidaydwisww/sig}} 03:53, 18 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
:::You are banned on Uncyclopedia for breaking your sig I see :D ~'''[[User:Red Rover112|<span style="color:red;">Red Rover</span>]]''' <small>([[User talk:Red Rover112|Talk to me!]])</small> <small>[[Special:Contributions/Red Rover112|contribs]]</small> 04:00, 18 September 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:00, 18 September 2011
Hi there!
I am Red Rover112 and you're here to leave me a message. I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I Have 3 simple rules:
|
||
Archives: Archive I |
Level 4 for first offence is excessively hash.
The warning you made here was excessively harsh, there are levels of warning for a reason, since it was the IP's second only edit and since the article shows no sign of spam insertion over the last 2 years a level one warning would have been more in order. Mtking (edits) 04:46, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- I for one (having spent a great deal of time on Uncyclopedia) have zero tolerance for spam and cyberbullying. ~Red Rover (Talk to me!) contribs 05:00, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Single issue warnings are almost never done (especially with ip's) because spam removal isn't really that hard to remove. Marcus Qwertyus 05:06, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Ok. ~Red Rover (Talk to me!) contribs 05:07, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- I am not saying the spam should not be removed on sight, just the level of warning used. Mtking (edits) 05:23, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, yes I was pointing out that I don't generally tolerate those that distribute it. ~Red Rover (Talk to me!) contribs 08:41, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- I am not saying the spam should not be removed on sight, just the level of warning used. Mtking (edits) 05:23, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Ok. ~Red Rover (Talk to me!) contribs 05:07, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Single issue warnings are almost never done (especially with ip's) because spam removal isn't really that hard to remove. Marcus Qwertyus 05:06, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
I
are eat cow. –Mnid (Let's talk about it!) 23:57, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
- Me too. ~Red Rover (Talk to me!) contribs 03:24, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
- No sorry. You to eat calv. –Mnid (Let's talk about it!) 03:53, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
- You are banned on Uncyclopedia for breaking your sig I see :D ~Red Rover (Talk to me!) contribs 04:00, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
- No sorry. You to eat calv. –Mnid (Let's talk about it!) 03:53, 18 September 2011 (UTC)