Jump to content

User talk:Red Rover112: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
:Me too. ~'''[[User:Red Rover112|<span style="color:red;">Red Rover</span>]]''' <small>([[User talk:Red Rover112|Talk to me!]])</small> <small>[[Special:Contributions/Red Rover112|contribs]]</small> 03:24, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
:Me too. ~'''[[User:Red Rover112|<span style="color:red;">Red Rover</span>]]''' <small>([[User talk:Red Rover112|Talk to me!]])</small> <small>[[Special:Contributions/Red Rover112|contribs]]</small> 03:24, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
::No sorry. You to eat calv. {{User:Mnidaydwisww/sig}} 03:53, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
::No sorry. You to eat calv. {{User:Mnidaydwisww/sig}} 03:53, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
:::You are banned on Uncyclopedia for breaking your sig I see :D ~'''[[User:Red Rover112|<span style="color:red;">Red Rover</span>]]''' <small>([[User talk:Red Rover112|Talk to me!]])</small> <small>[[Special:Contributions/Red Rover112|contribs]]</small> 04:00, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:00, 18 September 2011

Hi there!

I am Red Rover112 and you're here to leave me a message. I'll get back to you as soon as I can.

I Have 3 simple rules:


Archives: Archive I

Level 4 for first offence is excessively hash.

The warning you made here was excessively harsh, there are levels of warning for a reason, since it was the IP's second only edit and since the article shows no sign of spam insertion over the last 2 years a level one warning would have been more in order. Mtking (edits) 04:46, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I for one (having spent a great deal of time on Uncyclopedia) have zero tolerance for spam and cyberbullying. ~Red Rover (Talk to me!) contribs 05:00, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Single issue warnings are almost never done (especially with ip's) because spam removal isn't really that hard to remove. Marcus Qwertyus 05:06, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. ~Red Rover (Talk to me!) contribs 05:07, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am not saying the spam should not be removed on sight, just the level of warning used. Mtking (edits) 05:23, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, yes I was pointing out that I don't generally tolerate those that distribute it. ~Red Rover (Talk to me!) contribs 08:41, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I

are eat cow. –Mnid (Let's talk about it!) 23:57, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Me too. ~Red Rover (Talk to me!) contribs 03:24, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No sorry. You to eat calv. –Mnid (Let's talk about it!) 03:53, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You are banned on Uncyclopedia for breaking your sig I see :D ~Red Rover (Talk to me!) contribs 04:00, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]