Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Delegitimization as a tactic: Difference between revisions
Creating deletion discussion page for Wikipedia:Delegitimization as a tactic. (TW) |
Bobthefish2 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====[[Wikipedia:Delegitimization as a tactic]]==== |
====[[Wikipedia:Delegitimization as a tactic]]==== |
||
:{{pagelinks|Wikipedia:Delegitimization as a tactic}} |
:{{pagelinks|Wikipedia:Delegitimization as a tactic}} |
||
Uninsightful, garbled personal essay, serves only as a highly idiosyncratic personal argument by which one troubled editor apparently means to defend himself from his critics. "Delegitimation refers to the process whereby an editor and his or her diffs are undermined because of an alleged deviation from wiki-norms. It becomes a distraction from closer scrutiny of the content of an editor's writing. It is marginalizing or devaluing the legitimacy of a contributor to our encyclopedia building project." What is this supposed to mean, beyond "I feel butthurt because people have criticized my editing so much"? Delete or userfy; no chance this will become a useful opinion reference that others will commonly have reasons to refer to. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 03:43, 20 September 2011 (UTC) |
Uninsightful, garbled personal essay, serves only as a highly idiosyncratic personal argument by which one troubled editor apparently means to defend himself from his critics. "Delegitimation refers to the process whereby an editor and his or her diffs are undermined because of an alleged deviation from wiki-norms. It becomes a distraction from closer scrutiny of the content of an editor's writing. It is marginalizing or devaluing the legitimacy of a contributor to our encyclopedia building project." What is this supposed to mean, beyond "I feel butthurt because people have criticized my editing so much"? Delete or userfy; no chance this will become a useful opinion reference that others will commonly have reasons to refer to. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 03:43, 20 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
:Tenmei probably wrote this article as part of his rant [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Senkaku_Islands/Workshop#Delegitimization_as_a_tactic]] against other parties in an on-going ArbCom case. As it occurs, I am the person he is complaining about. --[[User:Bobthefish2|Bobthefish2]] ([[User talk:Bobthefish2|talk]]) 03:56, 20 September 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 03:56, 20 September 2011
Wikipedia:Delegitimization as a tactic
Uninsightful, garbled personal essay, serves only as a highly idiosyncratic personal argument by which one troubled editor apparently means to defend himself from his critics. "Delegitimation refers to the process whereby an editor and his or her diffs are undermined because of an alleged deviation from wiki-norms. It becomes a distraction from closer scrutiny of the content of an editor's writing. It is marginalizing or devaluing the legitimacy of a contributor to our encyclopedia building project." What is this supposed to mean, beyond "I feel butthurt because people have criticized my editing so much"? Delete or userfy; no chance this will become a useful opinion reference that others will commonly have reasons to refer to. Fut.Perf. ☼ 03:43, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
- Tenmei probably wrote this article as part of his rant Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Senkaku_Islands/Workshop#Delegitimization_as_a_tactic against other parties in an on-going ArbCom case. As it occurs, I am the person he is complaining about. --Bobthefish2 (talk) 03:56, 20 September 2011 (UTC)