Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electro house: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 174.254.131.96 - "" |
No edit summary Tag: repeating characters |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Saying the musical style does not exist is something that can only be described as Musical Ignorance. While it is a very wide genre, sometimes interwining with Progressive House, at it's core it is different from it. The real problem is that the page for the genre is so horribly written and completely baseless. Instead of an unnescesary deletion, I suggest researching into it (god knows how though..) and completely rewriting the article. [[User:Nekumata|Nekumata]] ([[User talk:Nekumata|talk]]) 12:18, 26 September 2011 (UTC) |
:Saying the musical style does not exist is something that can only be described as Musical Ignorance. While it is a very wide genre, sometimes interwining with Progressive House, at it's core it is different from it. The real problem is that the page for the genre is so horribly written and completely baseless. Instead of an unnescesary deletion, I suggest researching into it (god knows how though..) and completely rewriting the article. [[User:Nekumata|Nekumata]] ([[User talk:Nekumata|talk]]) 12:18, 26 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
: I support the rewriting of this article. The genre does exist, and while it may use some parts from progressive house, it is its own unique genre. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/174.254.131.96|174.254.131.96]] ([[User talk:174.254.131.96|talk]]) 02:29, 27 September 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
: I support the rewriting of this article. The genre does exist, and while it may use some parts from progressive house, it is its own unique genre. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/174.254.131.96|174.254.131.96]] ([[User talk:174.254.131.96|talk]]) 02:29, 27 September 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:<b>Strongly support (qualititative support so that it counts because I'm an IP address but that's actually my real username that I made)</b> - why does Wikipedia need more articles about genres of music? What's next? Articles about genres of Pokemon? That's something I'd like to see. -07:39, 30 September 2011 (UTC)07:39, 30 September 2011 (UTC)07:39, 30 September 2011 (UTC)07:39, 30 September 2011 (UTC)07:39, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[[Special:Contributions/220.245.253.81|220.245.253.81]] ([[User talk:220.245.253.81|talk]]) |
Revision as of 07:39, 30 September 2011
The music style does not exist. That's also why there ano serious refs for its existance. --Subfader (talk) 22:17, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- Saying the musical style does not exist is something that can only be described as Musical Ignorance. While it is a very wide genre, sometimes interwining with Progressive House, at it's core it is different from it. The real problem is that the page for the genre is so horribly written and completely baseless. Instead of an unnescesary deletion, I suggest researching into it (god knows how though..) and completely rewriting the article. Nekumata (talk) 12:18, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- I support the rewriting of this article. The genre does exist, and while it may use some parts from progressive house, it is its own unique genre. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.254.131.96 (talk) 02:29, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
- Strongly support (qualititative support so that it counts because I'm an IP address but that's actually my real username that I made) - why does Wikipedia need more articles about genres of music? What's next? Articles about genres of Pokemon? That's something I'd like to see. -07:39, 30 September 2011 (UTC)07:39, 30 September 2011 (UTC)07:39, 30 September 2011 (UTC)07:39, 30 September 2011 (UTC)07:39, 30 September 2011 (UTC)220.245.253.81 (talk)