Talk:Collaborative fiction: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:56, 13 October 2011

Collaborative fiction is currently a Literature good article nominee. Nominated by AdamCaputo (talk) at 22:00, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer.

Literature C‑class Mid‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge from wikinovel

I think these are two related but somewhat distinct topics. A wikinovel is a form of collaborative fiction, but a distinct one. The two sites should be linked.

Revert from 97.125.31.87

Hello all. User 97.125.31.87 sensibly noted that both wikistory and wikistory are effectively dead links and removed the paragraph that involved them. I reverted this - because I think their former existence was interesting to the field but changed the relevant paragraph by adding fact tags, putting into past tense and changing the language a little - hopefully this goes some way to dealing with the problems that the user found. I plan to come back with some references, but have to rush off now...

Pflat (talk) 18:49, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Structure

Editors watching the page will notice lots of movement as I try and get the structure right. Will stabilise shortly AdamCaputo (talk) 21:12, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Images

More images would be great. Any ideas? AdamCaputo (talk) 18:12, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

rewrite...

I just rewrote the too many cooks section in response to a tag left by an editor - it's great to see that other editors are getting involved - four different people edited the article last week, which I think is a first in it's history. If you've got any suggestions ect - it would be great to see them here... AdamCaputo (talk) 10:56, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 More images would be great. Any ideas? [[User:AdamCaputo|AdamCaputo]] ([[User talk:AdamCaputo|talk]]) 18:12, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
+== rewrite... ==
+I just rewrote the too many cooks section in response to a tag left by an editor - it's great to see that other editors are getting involved - four different people edited the article last week, which I think is a first in it's history.  If you've got any suggestions ect - it would be great to see them here... [[User:AdamCaputo|AdamCaputo]] ([[User talk:AdamCaputo|talk]]) 10:56, 13 October 2011 (UTC)