Friedrich Nietzsche's views on women: Difference between revisions
Got rid of poorly sourced and poorly written section. Tag: section blanking |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Nietzsche's views on women''' have attracted controversy, beginning during his life and continuing to the present. He frequently made remarks in his writing that some view as misogynistic. |
'''[[Friedrich Nietzsche]]'s views on women''' have attracted controversy, beginning during his life and continuing to the present. He frequently made remarks in his writing that some view as misogynistic. |
||
==Attitudes in public and in private== |
==Attitudes in public and in private== |
Revision as of 03:02, 14 October 2011
Friedrich Nietzsche's views on women have attracted controversy, beginning during his life and continuing to the present. He frequently made remarks in his writing that some view as misogynistic.
Attitudes in public and in private
Ida von Miaskowski remarked in her memoir, published 7 years after his death:
In the eighties, when Nietzsche's later writings containing some of the oft-quoted sharp words against women appeared, my husband sometimes told me jokingly not to tell people of my friendly relations with Nietzsche, since this was not very flattering for me. It was just a joke. My husband, like myself, always kept friendly memories of Nietzsche [...] his behavior precisely towards women was so sensitive, so natural and comradely, that even today in old age I cannot regard Nietzsche as a despiser of women.[1]
Negative remarks in his writings
Nietzsche frequently made remarks in his writing that some view as misogynistic. A few of the characteristic examples include
- Woman's love involves injustice and blindness against everything that she does not love... Woman is not yet capable of friendship: women are still cats and birds. Or at best cows... (Thus Spoke Zarathustra - On the Friend)
- (Nietzsche says similar of love in general in Gay Science.)
- [E]verything about woman has one solution: pregnancy... Man should be educated for war, and woman for the recreation of the warrior; all else is folly... Let woman be a plaything... The happiness of man is: I will. The happiness of woman is: he wills... You are going to woman? Do not forget the whip! (Thus Spoke Zarathustra - On Little Old and Young Women)
- Finally: woman! One-half of mankind is weak, typically sick, changeable, inconstant... she needs a religion of weakness that glorifies being weak, loving, and being humble as divine: or better, she makes the strong weak--she rules when she succeeds in overcoming the strong... Woman has always conspired with the types of decadence, the priests, against the "powerful", the "strong", the men-- (The Will to Power - 864)
Possible influence from Aristotle
Scholars of Aristotle have drawn comparisons between Nietzsche's views on women and Aristotle's views on women. They have argued that Nietzsche may have borrowed much of his political philosophy from the latter.[2]
Impact of Nietzsche's anthropology
Some philosophers have even suggested that Nietzsche's philosophy cannot be understood or analyzed apart from his remarks on women. They discuss the fact that Nietzsche's work has been useful in the development of some feminist theory but ultimately conclude "While Nietzsche challenges traditional hierarchies between mind and body, reason and irrationality, nature and culture, truth and fiction - hierarchies that have been used to degrade and exclude women - his remarks about women and his use of feminine and maternal metaphors throughout his writings confound attempts simply to proclaim Nietzsche a champion of feminism or women."[3]
Relationship with Salomé
Lou Andreas-Salomé, who knew Nietzsche very well, and claimed that he had proposed to her (according to her, she refused him) claimed there was something feminine in Nietzsche's "spiritual nature", and that he had considered genius to be a feminine genius.[4] Some of Andreas-Salomé's statements about Nietzsche have been called into question.
Apparent misogyny as rhetorical strategy
Frances Nesbitt Oppel interprets Nietzsche's attitude towards women as part of a rhetorical strategy.
...Nietzsche's apparent misogyny is part of his overall strategy to demonstrate that our attitudes toward sex-gender are thoroughly cultural, are often destructive of our own potential as individuals and as a species, and may be changed. What looks like misogyny may be understood as part of a larger strategy whereby "woman-as-such" (the universal essence of woman with timeless character traits) is shown to be a product of male desire, a construct.[5]
Not advocating a model for others
Others exhibit a less tolerant sophistication, though some recognize that Nietzsche made these remarks from a consciously relative position, and while they show little patience for his remarks overall they recognize that however odious his individual opinion of women may have been, he was not advocating it as a model for others. "Nietzsche, like Schopenhauer a prominent hater of women, at least relativizes his savage statements about woman-as-such."[6] One of Nietzsche's own statements is cited in support of this assertion:
"Whenever a cardinal problem is at stake, there speaks an unchangeable "this is I"; about man and woman, for example, a thinker cannot relearn but only finish learning–only discover ultimately how this is "settled in him." At times we find certain solutions of problems that inspire strong faith in us; some call them henceforth their "convictions." Later–we see them only as steps to self-knowledge, signposts to the problem we are–rather, to the great stupidity we are, to our spiritual fatum, to what is unteachable very "deep down".
After this abundant civility that I have just evidenced in relation to myself I shall perhaps be permitted more readily to state a few truths about "woman as such"–assuming that it is now known from the outset how very much these are after all only–my truths." (BGE, 7, 231)
Psychological digs and constructions
Another author takes up this same quote, recognizing that "[a]lthough Nietzsche as generously as ever saves his commentators the labor of interpretation the problem recurs precisely because of the nature of what he proceeds to call his truths." But instead of focusing on putative misogyny she opines:
Much more [...] must be thought to affect everything Nietzsche writes about woman. Rather than mere psychological digs and constructions, rather than a simple expression of his own misogyny, Nietzsche's philosophic expression of the nature of woman reflects and repeats the possibilities of the affirmation or denial of illusion. This is Nietzsche's understanding of truth, and to this extent Nietzsche was able to exploit his own misogyny, in style, tracing the Platonic metaphor as such.[7]
Women as source of all folly and unreason
Emphasis on the literal meaning of Nietzsche's words, followed by emotional reactions like Russell's are characteristic of much of the literature. As Leonard Lawlor and Zeynep Direk point out, "What Nietzsche says-and repeats with hysterical insistence-is that woman is the source of all folly and unreason, the siren figure who lures the male philosopher out of his appointed truth-seeking path."[8] Given the controversy regarding his attitudes towards women, precisely what Nietzsche means must be left to the individual reader to decide.
References
- ^ Ida von Miaskowski, cited in S. L. Gilman (Ed.), D. J. Parent (Trans.), Conversations with Nietzsche, A Life in the Words of His Contemporaries, Oxford University Press, 1987, p52
- ^ Durant, Will (1926 (2006). The Story of Philosophy. United States: Simon & Schuster, Inc., p. 86 ,ISBN 9780671739164.
- ^ Kelly Oliver, Marilyn Pearsall, "Introduction: Why Feminists Read Nietzsche", in Feminist Interpretations of Friedrich Nietzsche, Penn State Press, 1998, pp 1-4
- ^ Biddy Martin, Women and Modernity: The (Life)Styles of Lou Andreas-Salomé, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1991, p98
- ^ Frances Nesbitt Oppel, Nietzsche on Gender, University of Virginia Press, 2005, p1
- ^ Cornelia Klinger, Herta Nagl-Docekal, Continental Philosophy in Feminist Perspective, Penn State Press, 2002, p224
- ^ Babette E. Babich, Nietzsche's Philosophy of Science, SUNY Press, 1994, p241
- ^ Leonard Lawlor and Zeynep Direk, Derrida, Routledge, 2002, p139