Jump to content

Talk:Mobile enterprise: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
fix bad header placement for ReqMv, +wpp
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Business}}
{{WikiProject Telecommunication}}

==Mobile Enterprise==
"mobile enterprise" is an earlier version of "Mobile Enterprise"
"mobile enterprise" is an earlier version of "Mobile Enterprise"
the contents of the former entry are already contained in the the latter entry
the contents of the former entry are already contained in the the latter entry
Line 31: Line 35:
[[Special:Contributions/65.2.179.170|65.2.179.170]] ([[User talk:65.2.179.170|talk]]) 08:34, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
[[Special:Contributions/65.2.179.170|65.2.179.170]] ([[User talk:65.2.179.170|talk]]) 08:34, 17 March 2011 (UTC)


==Requested move==
{{Requested move/dated|Mobile enterprise}}
{{Requested move/dated|Mobile enterprise}}


[[Mobile Enterprise]] → {{no redirect|1=Mobile enterprise}} –
[[Mobile Enterprise]] → {{no redirect|1=Mobile enterprise}} –


==Requested move==
Per [[WP:CAPS]] ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and [[WP:TITLE]], this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. The thread at the top of this talk page seems most unconvincing. There are redirects, and there is no evidence to say that the results of different casing are "different". The "See also" section can be built up if necessary. [[User:Tony1|<span style="text-shadow:#BBBBBB 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml"><font color="darkgreen">'''Tony'''</font >]] [[User talk:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font ></span>]] 03:19, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Per [[WP:CAPS]] ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and [[WP:TITLE]], this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. The thread at the top of this talk page seems most unconvincing. There are redirects, and there is no evidence to say that the results of different casing are "different". The "See also" section can be built up if necessary. [[User:Tony1|<span style="text-shadow:#BBBBBB 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml"><font color="darkgreen">'''Tony'''</font >]] [[User talk:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font ></span>]] 03:19, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:53, 14 October 2011

WikiProject iconBusiness Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconTelecommunications Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Mobile Enterprise

"mobile enterprise" is an earlier version of "Mobile Enterprise" the contents of the former entry are already contained in the the latter entry the two documents are considered merged in my opinion therefore the entry "mobile enterprise" can be reomved leaving only "Mobile Enterprise"

however, when using wikipedia search the search is case sensitive "mobile enterprise" and "Mobile Enterprise" yield different search results may i suggest that search for mobile enterprise shall be case insentive so that both searches will find the same merged page

i have removed the contents of "mobile enterprise" and leaving only an internal link to "Mobile Enterprise"

Sources Required

Please can we have some sources on this topic - preferably independent and vendor-neutral commentary not just vendor material and press releases. --RichardVeryard 09:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I second this request. Unsourced phrases like "With the Mobile enterprise platform in place, entire businesses can be easily, quickly and economically moved onto the internet" seem problematic in an encyclopedia. janejellyroll 21:10, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flag for delete?

I think this page is unsalvagable as it currently stands. The first sentence "Mobile Enterprise (Mobile ERP) is a collection of Online Interactive Business Applications made possible by Mobile Broadband" defines "Mobile Enterprise", which is surely a broad term, as a collection of web-based applications. Further sentences, as janejellyroll mentions, both narrow it further and tie it to a particular product.

Perhaps "Mobile Enterprise" is too vague a term to warrant a definition or an entry. Whimsley (talk) 17:03, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it already

Why is this page still here? It reads like an advertisement for Intentia's software solutions.

65.2.179.170 (talk) 08:34, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Mobile EnterpriseMobile enterprise

Per WP:CAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. The thread at the top of this talk page seems most unconvincing. There are redirects, and there is no evidence to say that the results of different casing are "different". The "See also" section can be built up if necessary. Tony (talk) 03:19, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]