Jump to content

User talk:71.246.147.40: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Blocked: makes sense
Line 15: Line 15:
==Blocked==
==Blocked==
I'm going to block this IP address for a while as it's clearly being abused by a user who exercised a [[WP:RTV|right to vanish]] but has returned to edit "anonymously". Continuing abuse once the block has expired will result in an extension of the block. Of course, if the editor makes a request to reinstate their account, I'm sure something could be worked out. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 06:44, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
I'm going to block this IP address for a while as it's clearly being abused by a user who exercised a [[WP:RTV|right to vanish]] but has returned to edit "anonymously". Continuing abuse once the block has expired will result in an extension of the block. Of course, if the editor makes a request to reinstate their account, I'm sure something could be worked out. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 06:44, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

:Understood.[[Special:Contributions/71.246.147.40|71.246.147.40]] ([[User talk:71.246.147.40#top|talk]]) 07:30, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:30, 17 October 2011

Keep on

with your analysis—you're convincing me. I think it would be very useful for the FAC noms to have some kind of easy visual indication of how many page views the article gets. (p.s., I promise not to bring any low-hit mushroom articles to FAC for a while... your South Park analysis was on the mark—even though I had to dig around to figure out what the hell you were talking about). Sasata (talk) 08:27, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You were incorrect to reassess that article for WP:USRD as you did. The project assigns Stub, Start and C/B based on a metric involving how many of the "big three" sections (route description, history, junction/exit list) are present, and since all three are there, it's a C. To be bumped to a B, that's when citation density is considered. BTW, TCO, per WP:Courtesy vanishing, "Vanished users have no right to return under a new identity or as an IP." Please have your old account recreated and use it. Imzadi 1979  02:40, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to put what you want on the rating. Just stepping back and looking at it, regardless your rules, I disagree (because the sourcing is so light and poor). On the user name, let's not fight. I will leave your road articles alone.71.246.147.40 (talk) 02:48, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As for the account, you aren't following policy. You vanished, but came back. You need to do the right thing, or re-vanish and stay gone. Imzadi 1979  02:59, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I heard you. Please no more orange bars. You are probably right, but at this point are repeating a criticism. Peace...71.246.147.40 (talk) 03:00, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I'm going to block this IP address for a while as it's clearly being abused by a user who exercised a right to vanish but has returned to edit "anonymously". Continuing abuse once the block has expired will result in an extension of the block. Of course, if the editor makes a request to reinstate their account, I'm sure something could be worked out. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:44, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Understood.71.246.147.40 (talk) 07:30, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]