User talk:24.228.90.14

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:32, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been warned, when you edited from your account, not to mess around on the reference desks. You have been blocked for continuing to do so. TNXMan 18:16, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text , but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TNXMan 18:16, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

24.228.90.14 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

on one hand this was a fair block, but on the other hand it is not fair at all. i asked a lot of intelligence questions, and none of the questions i asked on the rference desk were stupid, they were of a thought provoke nature. I would like the community to review the length of this block because i am not sure i asked any stupid reference questions in the past several months. thank you. 24.228.90.14 (talk) 19:24, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=on one hand this was a fair block, but on the other hand it is not fair at all. i asked a lot of intelligence questions, and none of the questions i asked on the rference desk were stupid, they were of a thought provoke nature. I would like the community to review the length of this block because i am not sure i asked any stupid reference questions in the past several months. thank you. [[Special:Contributions/24.228.90.14|24.228.90.14]] ([[User talk:24.228.90.14#top|talk]]) 19:24, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=on one hand this was a fair block, but on the other hand it is not fair at all. i asked a lot of intelligence questions, and none of the questions i asked on the rference desk were stupid, they were of a thought provoke nature. I would like the community to review the length of this block because i am not sure i asked any stupid reference questions in the past several months. thank you. [[Special:Contributions/24.228.90.14|24.228.90.14]] ([[User talk:24.228.90.14#top|talk]]) 19:24, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=on one hand this was a fair block, but on the other hand it is not fair at all. i asked a lot of intelligence questions, and none of the questions i asked on the rference desk were stupid, they were of a thought provoke nature. I would like the community to review the length of this block because i am not sure i asked any stupid reference questions in the past several months. thank you. [[Special:Contributions/24.228.90.14|24.228.90.14]] ([[User talk:24.228.90.14#top|talk]]) 19:24, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Before any decision is reached, could you list any other accounts you have edited under? This is so we can tell how far-reaching this pattern of behavior is; that would give us an indication of how likely it is to repeat. --Jayron32 19:58, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

I LIKE TO EDIT ANONYMOUSLY. and i have lots of internet ip in the past for many years but i forgot wut i[ address they use. when i have to log in, i log in as Fran Cranley. but that is my real name so pls do not publicize it, and it is my ONLY ACCOUNT.

Since you've admitted it, a brief review of Special:Contributions/Fran_Cranley should assist the reviewing admin. TNXMan 20:06, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

WHY WOULD I NOT "ADMIT" IT!!!!!11 U R A CHECK USER, SO U CAN SEE FOR YOURSELF.