User talk:Swarm: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 2d) to User talk:Swarm/Archive 6. |
→Hobartimus and WP:BAN: new section |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
Do your research before you assume anything, Swarm. The Romans had forward military outposts deep in the Arabian desert. Look up the limes arabicus and Dumatha for starters. Otherwise, refrain from labellimg maps as "ridiculously" wrong until you know better. |
Do your research before you assume anything, Swarm. The Romans had forward military outposts deep in the Arabian desert. Look up the limes arabicus and Dumatha for starters. Otherwise, refrain from labellimg maps as "ridiculously" wrong until you know better. |
||
== Hobartimus and WP:BAN == |
|||
Sorry to bother again, but it seems that the previous [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Swarm&diff=460060265&oldid=460059894 ample explanations] were not sufficient for Hobartimus. He still refuses to acknowledge that the edits of a banned user [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ban#Enforcement_by_reverting may be reinstated] if they are considered by an editor to be helpful: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Magyarization&action=history][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=S%C3%A1ndor_Pet%C5%91fi&action=history] |
|||
I checked the two contributions myself and and I go along with them, but Hobartimus is not interested to discuss the edits themselves, preferring to refer to their initial author as an alleged criteria for invalidation. His approach is user-oriented, not content-oriented. Instead of focusing on expanding articles, his main [[WP:SPA|purpose]] here seems to be the complete neutralization of Iaaasi 's sockpuppets, without giving much importance to collateral effects. Some other remarks: |
|||
* He has a special [[User:Hobartimus/sandbox4|sandbox]] dedicated to Iaasi and his own revert rule interpretation does not apply when the banned sock master is someone else ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kingdom_of_Hungary_in_the_Middle_Ages&action=historysubmit&diff=428929442&oldid=428736466 here] or [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=H%C5%91s%C3%B6k_tere&action=historysubmit&diff=431984223&oldid=431465071 here] he reinstated texts added by blocked socks of the banned [[User:Stubes99]]) |
|||
* "if you're going to start accusing other editors of being socks, you need to file an SPI, or shut up." - he has already done that, and not only once. The administrators confirmed my innocence each time and a CheckUser even complained that [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Daccono&diff=454904843&oldid=454902602#Clerk.2C_CheckUser.2C_and.2For_patrolling_admin_comments "It's getting frustrating to review this case over and over again."] He is constanly showing enmity towards me. He is reverting my edits without giving a minimal motivation: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1848%E2%80%931849_massacres_in_Transylvania&diff=456221636&oldid=455560141 "rv to an earlier version"] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=H%C5%91s%C3%B6k_tere&diff=prev&oldid=431984223 "rv"] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=H%C5%91s%C3%B6k_tere&diff=prev&oldid=431985766 "rv Daccono"]. Can you please assist me in this matter? Maybe a [[WP:DIGWUREN]] warning would be salutary too [[User:Daccono|Daccono]] ([[User talk:Daccono|talk]]) 06:21, 16 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:21, 16 November 2011
Template:Archive box collapsible
 | Swarm is away on vacation and may not respond swiftly to queries. |  |
{{NOTOC}}: incorrect syntax, use {{subst:NOTOC}} or __NOTOC__ instead.
| This is Swarm's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Swarm
Home —— Talk —— Email —— Contribs —— Awards —— Dash
Roman Empire Map
Do your research before you assume anything, Swarm. The Romans had forward military outposts deep in the Arabian desert. Look up the limes arabicus and Dumatha for starters. Otherwise, refrain from labellimg maps as "ridiculously" wrong until you know better.
Hobartimus and WP:BAN
Sorry to bother again, but it seems that the previous ample explanations were not sufficient for Hobartimus. He still refuses to acknowledge that the edits of a banned user may be reinstated if they are considered by an editor to be helpful: [1][2]
I checked the two contributions myself and and I go along with them, but Hobartimus is not interested to discuss the edits themselves, preferring to refer to their initial author as an alleged criteria for invalidation. His approach is user-oriented, not content-oriented. Instead of focusing on expanding articles, his main purpose here seems to be the complete neutralization of Iaaasi 's sockpuppets, without giving much importance to collateral effects. Some other remarks:
- He has a special sandbox dedicated to Iaasi and his own revert rule interpretation does not apply when the banned sock master is someone else (here or here he reinstated texts added by blocked socks of the banned User:Stubes99)
- "if you're going to start accusing other editors of being socks, you need to file an SPI, or shut up." - he has already done that, and not only once. The administrators confirmed my innocence each time and a CheckUser even complained that "It's getting frustrating to review this case over and over again." He is constanly showing enmity towards me. He is reverting my edits without giving a minimal motivation: "rv to an earlier version" "rv" "rv Daccono". Can you please assist me in this matter? Maybe a WP:DIGWUREN warning would be salutary too Daccono (talk) 06:21, 16 November 2011 (UTC)