User talk:Jane1222556: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Block reset: new section |
←Blanked the page |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== November 2011 == |
|||
[[Image:Information.svg|left|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to [[:Quidco]], did not appear to be constructive and has been '''automatically [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]''' (undone) by [[User:ClueBot NG|ClueBot NG]]. |
|||
* Please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and [[WP:ADMINS|administrators]] have the ability to [[WP:BLOCK|block]] users from editing if they repeatedly engage in [[WP:vandalism|vandalism]]. |
|||
* ClueBot NG produces very few [[User:ClueBot NG#Information About False Positives|false positives]], but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please [[User:ClueBot NG#Information About False Positives|read about it]], [{{User:ClueBot NG/Warnings/FPReport|727907}} report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again. |
|||
* The following is the log entry regarding this warning: [[Quidco]] was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Quidco&diff=460796963&oldid=456531215 changed] by [[Special:Contributions/Jane1222556|Jane1222556]] [[User:Jane1222556|(u)]] [[User talk:Jane1222556|(t)]] ANN scored at 0.915768 on 2011-11-15T16:30:19+00:00 <!-- MySQL ID: 727907 -->. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> [[User:ClueBot NG|ClueBot NG]] ([[User talk:ClueBot NG|talk]]) 16:30, 15 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
<div style=clear: both></div>[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Quidco]] with <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quidco?diff=460798324 this edit]</span>. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-2 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning2 -->[[User:Calabe1992|Calabe]][[User talk:Calabe1992|1992]] 16:40, 15 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hi, and thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Jane1222556|your contributions]] to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on [[:User talk:Calabe1992]] were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved by another user. In the future you can use the "New section" link in top right. For more details see [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page guidelines]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-toppost --> ''Please see my talk page.'' [[User:Calabe1992|Calabe]][[User talk:Calabe1992|1992]] 16:47, 15 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
<div style=clear: both></div>[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to [[:Quidco]] with <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quidco?diff=460802460 this edit]</span>, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]].<!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> [[User:Calabe1992|Calabe]][[User talk:Calabe1992|1992]] 17:09, 15 November 2011 (UTC)<!-- Template:Huggle/warn-npov-3 --> |
|||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=|link=]] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at [[:Quidco]], you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-npov4 --> [[User:Calabe1992|Calabe]][[User talk:Calabe1992|1992]] 22:34, 15 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== 3RR notice on [[Quidco]] == |
|||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] Your recent editing history at [[:Quidco]] shows that you are in danger of breaking the [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule]], or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. '''Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a [[WP:BLOCK|block]].''' |
|||
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's [[WP:TALK|talk page]] to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. You may still be blocked for [[WP:EDITWAR|edit warring]] even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> --- [[User:Barek|Barek]] <small>([[User talk:Barek|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Barek|contribs]])</small> - 22:36, 15 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours''' for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Page protection|page protection]]. - [[User:Barek|Barek]] <small>([[User talk:Barek|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Barek|contribs]])</small> - 22:42, 15 November 2011 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> |
|||
{{unblock reviewed | 1=my considered and very helpful comments are considered vandalism | decline=The [[WP:TRUTH]] is not the goal here: all edits must be [[WP:V|verifiable]] via third party [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. "Forums" are not reliable sources. Your word is [[WP:OR|original research]] and is not verifiable, and therefore no good. You were appropriately warned to stop, yet you continued. As such, you're validly blocked to protect this project from such actions ([[User talk:Bwilkins|<font style="font-variant:small-caps">talk→</font>]]<span style="border:1px solid black;">''' [[User:Bwilkins|BWilkins]] '''</span>[[Special:Contributions/Bwilkins|<font style="font-variant:small-caps">←track</font>]]) 00:55, 16 November 2011 (UTC)}} |
|||
I was blocked for adding a comment that would have been very useful to users of Wikipedia. It could have saved them a lot of time and money being better informed. |
|||
Donations anyone? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jane1222556|Jane1222556]] ([[User talk:Jane1222556|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jane1222556|contribs]]) 00:43, 16 November 2011</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> |
|||
:In response to your email asking: "''Do you think Wiki is to be run by a cabal?''" ... please see [[WP:Words of wisdom]], particularly the section titled "On Wikipedia and the Cabal". In short, there is no cabal. --- [[User:Barek|Barek]] <small>([[User talk:Barek|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Barek|contribs]])</small> - 00:54, 16 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::Sorry for the short comment - I was heading out the door at the time and posted that in a bit of a rush. |
|||
::To explain further ... your block was directly related to edit warring and breaking of the three-revert rule (see [[WP:3RR]]). In this case, you were adding material that was not supported by reliable source. |
|||
::Please be aware that the threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth (see [[WP:V]]). Believing something to be true isn't enough, particularly when that material is potentially viewed as judgmental, opinion, or non-neutral - in such cases, a third-party reliable source is required to provide the verifiability (see [[WP:RS]] for explanation of what qualifies as a reliable source). Failure to provide a reliable source gives the impression that the material is original research, which fails the verifiability requirement (see [[WP:NOR]]). |
|||
::When your block expires, a few options exist. First, if you can locate a reliable source to support the statement, feel free to provide a neutrally worded version of the material. If it is still removed, discuss the material on the article talk page. Every article on Wikipedia has a talk page (the tab above the article labeled as either "talk" or "discussion", depending upon your settings). On that page, a discussion can take place between interested parties to attempt to establish a community consensus as to how to proceed with the content. --- [[User:Barek|Barek]] <small>([[User talk:Barek|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Barek|contribs]])</small> - 01:57, 16 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
=== Block reset === |
|||
Due to your obvious block evasion using {{ipuser|217.171.129.73}}, your block for edit warring has been reset to 72 hours, starting now. Further transgressions will be met with sterner measures. [[User:Favonian|Favonian]] ([[User talk:Favonian|talk]]) 16:09, 16 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||