Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire in anger: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Fire in anger: Move content
→‎Fire in anger: delete - dictionary definition
Line 11: Line 11:
:Delete as an article, recreate as desired as wiktionary entry.[[User:GraemeLeggett|GraemeLeggett]] ([[User talk:GraemeLeggett|talk]]) 19:36, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
:Delete as an article, recreate as desired as wiktionary entry.[[User:GraemeLeggett|GraemeLeggett]] ([[User talk:GraemeLeggett|talk]]) 19:36, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
*'''Move content and redirect''' as per France3470. [[User:Buckshot06|Buckshot06]] [[User_talk:Buckshot06|(talk)]] 20:04, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
*'''Move content and redirect''' as per France3470. [[User:Buckshot06|Buckshot06]] [[User_talk:Buckshot06|(talk)]] 20:04, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - Bare dictionary definition. NB: Maintaining the namespace to preserve links and provide readers with a definition is ALSO counter to policy. In addition to not being a dictionary, Wikipedia does not provide in-article links to a dictionary. - [[User:DustFormsWords|DustFormsWords]] ([[User talk:DustFormsWords|talk]]) 05:45, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:45, 25 November 2011

Fire in anger

Fire in anger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's simply a phrase definition. I'm also dubious about its classification as military terminology. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:05, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- saberwyn 10:30, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- saberwyn 10:30, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an article, recreate as desired as wiktionary entry.GraemeLeggett (talk) 19:36, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]