Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 December 15: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→File:A549 bridges -- 7-28-at1616.jpg: bit for bit identical |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Was never placed on IFD, but admins refuse to undelete it at [[Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion]]. It is a free, encyclopedic image of my own work that I uploaded that contrary to the deleting admin (who didn't look at the image closely enough), it was not a duplicate of a Commons image. [[User:John Riemann Soong|John Riemann Soong]] ([[User talk:John Riemann Soong|talk]]) 03:08, 15 December 2011 (UTC) |
Was never placed on IFD, but admins refuse to undelete it at [[Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion]]. It is a free, encyclopedic image of my own work that I uploaded that contrary to the deleting admin (who didn't look at the image closely enough), it was not a duplicate of a Commons image. [[User:John Riemann Soong|John Riemann Soong]] ([[User talk:John Riemann Soong|talk]]) 03:08, 15 December 2011 (UTC) |
||
*As I said on the [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#File:A549_bridges_--_7-28-at1616.jpg|WP:REFUND thread]], the images are bit for bit identical. Any admin can look at the full size picture for both the [[:File:Intercellular connections in a549 cells.jpg|commons version]] and the deleted wikipedia version and see they both hash to 6be87eaea86c8ce92c51d46ea4b0e144 (w/ [[MD5]]). [[User:Protonk|Protonk]] ([[User talk:Protonk|talk]]) 04:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC) |
*As I said on the [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#File:A549_bridges_--_7-28-at1616.jpg|WP:REFUND thread]], the images are bit for bit identical. Any admin can look at the full size picture for both the [[:File:Intercellular connections in a549 cells.jpg|commons version]] and the deleted wikipedia version and see they both hash to 6be87eaea86c8ce92c51d46ea4b0e144 (w/ [[MD5]]). [[User:Protonk|Protonk]] ([[User talk:Protonk|talk]]) 04:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC) |
||
*But the local copy was rudely deleted without my knowledge. Could I please have it back? [[User:John Riemann Soong|John Riemann Soong]] ([[User talk:John Riemann Soong|talk]]) 06:39, 15 December 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:39, 15 December 2011
Was never placed on IFD, but admins refuse to undelete it at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. It is a free, encyclopedic image of my own work that I uploaded that contrary to the deleting admin (who didn't look at the image closely enough), it was not a duplicate of a Commons image. John Riemann Soong (talk) 03:08, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- As I said on the WP:REFUND thread, the images are bit for bit identical. Any admin can look at the full size picture for both the commons version and the deleted wikipedia version and see they both hash to 6be87eaea86c8ce92c51d46ea4b0e144 (w/ MD5). Protonk (talk) 04:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- But the local copy was rudely deleted without my knowledge. Could I please have it back? John Riemann Soong (talk) 06:39, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
