Jump to content

User talk:JamesSutton: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
reply
Line 5: Line 5:


Unless you are able to prove that Coleridge had constipation and used enemas using significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject then it's vandalism, pure and simple. -- [[User:Roleplayer|'''<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#006400">role</span>''']][[User talk:Roleplayer|'''''<sup><em style="font-family:Verdana;color:#9ACD32">player</em></sup>''''']] 20:39, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Unless you are able to prove that Coleridge had constipation and used enemas using significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject then it's vandalism, pure and simple. -- [[User:Roleplayer|'''<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#006400">role</span>''']][[User talk:Roleplayer|'''''<sup><em style="font-family:Verdana;color:#9ACD32">player</em></sup>''''']] 20:39, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

THIS IS MENTIONED IN VOL. 2 ON RICHARD HUGHES' DEFINITIVE BIOGRAPHY OF COLERIDGE, "DARKER REFLECTIONS," on PP. 12-14. THERE IS NO GREATER AUTHORITATIVE BIOGRAPHICAL SOURCE ON COLERIDGE THAN RICHARD HUGHES.James Hercules Sutton 20:49, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:49, 4 February 2012

February 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Samuel Taylor Coleridge, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. roleplayer 20:28, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

IF IT WAS TRUE (IT IS), THEN IT'S CONSTRUCTIVE. ALIMENTARY, MY DEAR WATSON.

Unless you are able to prove that Coleridge had constipation and used enemas using significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject then it's vandalism, pure and simple. -- roleplayer 20:39, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

THIS IS MENTIONED IN VOL. 2 ON RICHARD HUGHES' DEFINITIVE BIOGRAPHY OF COLERIDGE, "DARKER REFLECTIONS," on PP. 12-14. THERE IS NO GREATER AUTHORITATIVE BIOGRAPHICAL SOURCE ON COLERIDGE THAN RICHARD HUGHES.James Hercules Sutton 20:49, 4 February 2012 (UTC)