Jump to content

Audi alteram partem: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:


Today, legal systems differ on whether individuals can be convicted ''[[in absentia]]''.
Today, legal systems differ on whether individuals can be convicted ''[[in absentia]]''.

The principle is highly used in labour law matters in countries like South Africa and Zimbabwe.


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 11:44, 13 February 2012

Decorative 18th century door piece from the Vierschaar (city tribunal) in City Hall of The Hague, by Jacob de Wit, illustrating Audi alteram partem.

Audi alteram partem (or audiatur et altera pars) is a Latin phrase that literally means "It should be heard [audiatur] also the other party", "hear [audi] the other side too", or "hear the alternative party too".[1] It is most often used to refer to the principle that no person should be judged without a fair hearing in which each party is given the opportunity to respond to the evidence against them.[2]

The other principle of natural justice is Nemo iudex in causa sua (or nemo iudex in sua causa) a Latin phrase that means, literally, "no-one should be a judge in their own cause." It is a principle of natural justice that no person can judge a case in which they have an interest. The rule is very strictly applied to any appearance of a possible bias, even if there is actually none: "Justice must not only be done, but must be seen to be done".

"Audi alteram partem" is considered a principle of fundamental justice or equity in most legal systems. The principle includes the rights of a party or his lawyers to confront the witnesses against him, to have a fair opportunity to challenge the evidence presented by the other party, to summon one's own witnesses and to present evidence, and to have counsel, if necessary at public expense, in order to make one's case properly.

History of use

As a general principle of rationality in reaching conclusions in disputed matters, "Hear both sides" was treated as part of common wisdom by the ancient Greek dramatists.[3]

The principle was referred to by the International Court of Justice in the Nuclear Tests case, referring to France's non-appearance at judgment.[4]

Today, legal systems differ on whether individuals can be convicted in absentia.

The principle is highly used in labour law matters in countries like South Africa and Zimbabwe.

See also

References