Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southies: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Relisting debate |
Delete |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Wifione|'''<span style="color: red;"> Wifione</span>''']] [[User talk:Wifione|'''<sup>Message</sup>''']] 04:29, 13 February 2012 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Wifione|'''<span style="color: red;"> Wifione</span>''']] [[User talk:Wifione|'''<sup>Message</sup>''']] 04:29, 13 February 2012 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
||
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
||
*'''Delete''' [http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2010/09/05/cluster_of_animation_studios_grows_up_around_watertown/ This <i>Boston Globe</i> article], which is behind a paywall, briefly mentions the series; it was published after the show appeared online but long before the lone television episode was broadcast. In my opinion, that article doesn't even count towards significant coverage. I think this subject pretty clearly fails the [[WP:GNG|general notability guideline]]. [[User:A Stop at Willoughby|A Stop at Willoughby]] ([[User talk:A Stop at Willoughby|talk]]) 02:35, 21 February 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:35, 21 February 2012
- Southies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This failed television pilot fails Wikipedia's general notability guideline. Neelix (talk) 01:23, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - per WP:Notability_(media)#Programming "it was cancelled too quickly to have garnered any significant media coverage.". Can not find any news articles and it has been removed from Adults Swim's website (except for an old interview) Cimorcus talk 03:49, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wifione Message 04:29, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Delete This Boston Globe article, which is behind a paywall, briefly mentions the series; it was published after the show appeared online but long before the lone television episode was broadcast. In my opinion, that article doesn't even count towards significant coverage. I think this subject pretty clearly fails the general notability guideline. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 02:35, 21 February 2012 (UTC)