Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darrell Lunsford: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Keep and rename
Line 8: Line 8:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 19:33, 17 February 2012 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 19:33, 17 February 2012 (UTC)</small>


*'''Keep''' and rename to [[Murder of Darell Lunsford]], as I think has done previously for articles about otherwise non-notable murder victims. I think that the references already found in the article, while they need to be reformatted, easily disprove the assertion that there is "no evidence of notability" here. [[User:A Stop at Willoughby|A Stop at Willoughby]] ([[User talk:A Stop at Willoughby|talk]]) 03:27, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' and rename to [[Murder of Darell Lunsford]], as I think has been done previously for articles about otherwise non-notable murder victims. I think that the references already found in the article, while they need to be reformatted, easily disprove the assertion that there is "no evidence of notability" here. [[User:A Stop at Willoughby|A Stop at Willoughby]] ([[User talk:A Stop at Willoughby|talk]]) 03:27, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:36, 21 February 2012

Darrell Lunsford (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Known essentially only for his death. Does not go beyond WP:ONEVENT. (Note: PROD was contested without explanation by an account that has since been indefinitely blocked as a sockpuppet created to evade a block on the creator of the article.) JamesBWatson (talk) 15:11, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]